From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
hpa@zytor.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix PAGE_KERNEL_IO removal breakage
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:35:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9148a579-2843-96f8-9b64-a3adb8fcb411@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203002513.fa43j6uvsn2ho4mm@ldmartin-desk2>
On 12/2/21 4:25 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> About the first patch,
> 6b2a2138cf36 ("drm/i915/gem: Stop using PAGE_KERNEL_IO"),
> I didn't notice any regression on the i915
> side though. Is it safe to keep it? Otherwise we are probably better
> off reverting everything.
I'm just going to drop both of those for now:
27dff0f58bde ("x86/mm: Nuke PAGE_KERNEL_IO")
6b2a2138cf36 ("drm/i915/gem: Stop using PAGE_KERNEL_IO")
If you work out a fix, please integrate the patch from Joerg and resubmit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-02 14:46 Joerg Roedel
2021-12-02 15:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-02 15:55 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-12-03 0:25 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-12-03 17:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-03 17:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-03 18:48 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-12-03 17:35 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2021-12-03 19:11 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-12-02 18:15 ` [tip: x86/mm] " tip-bot2 for Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9148a579-2843-96f8-9b64-a3adb8fcb411@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®