From: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: David Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>,
Dave Chiluk <chiluk@canonical.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bfields@fieldses.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for Ni
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:28:21 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <916743278.65.1366903701195.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366899034.6812.4.camel@leira.trondhjem.org>
Hi,
Just to clarify, the IBM delay behavior is not legal?
Matt
----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> OK, then. Now all I need is actual motivation for changing the
> existing
> code other than handwaving arguments about "polling is better than
> flat
> waits".
> What actual use cases are impacting us now, other than the AIX design
> decision to force CLOSE to retry at least once before succeeding?
>
--
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
http://linuxbox.com
tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-25 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 20:55 [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for NFS4_ERRDELAY Dave Chiluk
2013-04-24 21:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-24 21:28 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-24 21:54 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-04-24 22:35 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 12:19 ` David Wysochanski
2013-04-25 13:19 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 13:29 ` bfields
2013-04-25 13:30 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 13:49 ` bfields
2013-04-25 14:10 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 15:28 ` Matt W. Benjamin [this message]
2013-04-25 15:42 ` [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for Ni Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 18:19 ` [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for NFS4_ERRDELAY bfields
2013-04-25 18:40 ` Chuck Lever
2013-04-25 18:46 ` bfields
2013-04-25 18:51 ` Chuck Lever
2013-04-25 18:57 ` bfields
2013-04-25 18:52 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 14:51 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=916743278.65.1366903701195.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com \
--to=matt@linuxbox.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chiluk@canonical.com \
--cc=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®