From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0DEC46460 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E7521D6B for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:36:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 36E7521D6B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731117AbeHIOBV (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:01:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:54355 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727768AbeHIOBV (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:01:21 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id c14-v6so6024812wmb.4 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 04:36:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5RXniGpM6rRl6O/Oi4tCIuIJgg3/y5iJIg4WKB7Ouv0=; b=oG0ycmFBISVbPjER9ZyolAkb2C4/6FThRz1gOJrG+e5ZlrMnjJLCzQWuTMdWYyMRwr IjkYGnDj34i62PXqJnWkIrSwHO/lt/J/E1KB9xXXtiYda0BYeZZsZRVnv5OKvMhvwUFq CM2GbD4BEbIO3IWGDPzwg1ZFxq2lcJdc4CtXmxvA/nJGpb6tPdUnemWKjZWiwX40v6ki qLPYf1sJ2kirCTJLLcGW7NPIyB3ckZu05Exo/R143aRiBdKVmMBxwdhrLAr6+jlJE9wO epSuRpRxDHg1uxdQBot913zJfcK++1JBQk9Q/uGT7UGqbYrg1Sm4+wKus1Zo2ZAN5y5Y PTkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFudWqYtS2MMq5kBW2feVdH90KrY2qk+3+f1u8fWiYAYSVG9IVZ bp4txEsaK4EUbydJfL2AvydRLg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxQOdqmckDqnnHYbEbHsa5Dr7KIC9ndoCCGP+QJx1K753punFNAyGcwdjfI1JSolYQkssZHuA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:37cd:: with SMTP id e196-v6mr1329897wma.84.1533814612107; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 04:36:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shalem.localdomain (546A5441.cm-12-3b.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [84.106.84.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m68-v6sm14900987wmb.10.2018.08.09.04.36.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Aug 2018 04:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] ACPI / scan: Initialize status to ACPI_STA_DEFAULT To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andy Shevchenko , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Darren Hart , Wolfram Sang , Srinivas Pandruvada , ACPI Devel Maling List , Platform Driver , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Heikki Krogerus , linux-i2c References: <20180809091558.4317-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20180809091558.4317-2-hdegoede@redhat.com> <7d8c71b9-292e-e51e-d3d3-cb0bb00528b6@redhat.com> From: Hans de Goede Message-ID: <9169f2a6-7835-0472-9b08-320106125716@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:36:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 09-08-18 11:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 09-08-18 11:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Hans de Goede >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 09-08-18 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Hans de Goede >>>>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> I've applied the v4 of this patch and I don't think there are any >>>>> changes from it here. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Correct, there were only changes to the 4th patch in the series. >>>> >>>>> As for the rest of the series I'll wait from comments from Wolfram and >>>>> the other reviewers. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ok, note if you've taken patch 1 you may also want to take patch 3 which >>>> is an ACPI code cleanup made possible by patch 1 and otherwise is >>>> unrelated. >>> >>> >>> I'm under impression Rafael is going to take entire series (at least >>> for patch 4 I'm expecting to give an Ack). >> >> >> As I mentioned in the coverletter, my idea was to have Rafael take >> patches 1-3 and then merge the 4th patch through the platform/x86 >> tree. There are only runtime dependencies between the 2 parts and >> merging them independently should not cause any issues. > > I can apply the 4th one too if it is ACKed by everyone with a vested interest. That works for me, note I'm about to send out a v6 (with only changes to the 4th patch), so hold of a bit with merging this please. Andy does your ack for the 4th patch mean you're ok with Rafael merging this? Regards, Hans