From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
To: Sanghyun Park <sanghyun.park.cnu@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix stack out-of-bounds write in cgroup link update
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 15:48:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <916b5920-a2f4-4b05-b86e-6a29e599ffad@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805052858.2390918-3-sanghyun.park.cnu@gmail.com>
On 2026/8/5 13:28, Sanghyun Park wrote:
> The cgroup link update path checks only the program type, allowing a UDP6
> sock_addr program to replace the program on a UDP4 link. Running the
> replacement writes past the smaller IPv4 context into ipcm_cookie::opt on the
> stack.
>
> Require a replacement sock_addr program to have the same expected attach type
> as the link before changing link state. Limit the check to sock_addr programs
> so update policy for other cgroup program types remains unchanged.
>
> Fixes: 0c991ebc8c69 ("bpf: Implement bpf_prog replacement for an active bpf_cgroup_link")
> Signed-off-by: Sanghyun Park <sanghyun.park.cnu@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index d2da5063d8f8..65bf25deac4f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -1055,6 +1055,10 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_replace(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> if (link->link.prog->type != new_prog->type)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (new_prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR &&
not only BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, but also
BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK, etc. I think we can
make it general.
> + link->link.attach_type != new_prog->expected_attach_type)
use link->link.prog->expected_attach_type
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> hlist_for_each_entry(pl, progs, node) {
> if (pl->link == link) {
> found = true;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 5:28 Sanghyun Park
2026-08-05 7:48 ` Pu Lehui [this message]
2026-08-13 6:15 ` Sanghyun Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=916b5920-a2f4-4b05-b86e-6a29e599ffad@huawei.com \
--to=pulehui@huawei.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=sanghyun.park.cnu@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®