From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932896AbdAKXQa (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 18:16:30 -0500 Received: from us01smtprelay-2.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:40496 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752231AbdAKXQ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 18:16:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board To: John Stultz , John Youn References: <1483473157-16678-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> CC: lkml , Wei Xu , Guodong Xu , Amit Pundir , "Rob Herring" , Vardan Mikayelyan , Douglas Anderson , Chen Yu , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , "Felipe Balbi" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" From: John Youn Message-ID: <91748679-1741-73ed-2750-25cda43ed56f@synopsys.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:16:25 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.9.138.223] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/11/2017 3:10 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:58 PM, John Youn wrote: >> On 1/11/2017 2:39 PM, John Stultz wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:08 PM, John Youn wrote: >>>> On 1/3/2017 11:52 AM, John Stultz wrote: >>>>> Hope everyone had a happy new years! >>>>> >>>>> I just wanted to send out my current queue of patches for dwc2 >>>>> controller on the HiKey board for consideration for the 4.11 >>>>> merge window. >>>>> >>>>> This does exclude my patchset[1] to add extcon support to dwc2, >>>>> which John Youn suspects a pending rework of the dwc2 fifo init >>>>> logic might make unnecssary. >>>>> >>>>> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated! >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi John, >>>> >>>> Do you need these in 4.10-rc or is 4.11 ok? >>> >>> So I was submitting these for 4.11. >>> >>> The only one which was sort of a regression fix (though introduced in >>> 4.9 rather then 4.10) was the "Avoid suspending if we're in gadget >>> mode" one, which you seemed to submit for 4.10-rc already. >>> >>> Let me know if there is anything you need prior to queuing the rest for 4.11. >>> >> >> Ok. The only one that will have a problem will be patch 5 due to my >> recent series [1]. >> >> Can you rebase against that? > > Do you have a git branch for that series to rebase against? > https://github.com/synopsys-usb/linux.git branch 'next' Regards, John