From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com,
antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, sohil.mehta@intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86/lam: Disable ADDRESS_MASKING in most cases
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 18:35:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <919b6370a908bb091779ec2eca7ca5e369d57847.1705631230.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Intel feature Linear Address Masking (LAM) has a weakness related to
transient execution as described in the SLAM paper[1]. Unless Linear
Address Space Separation (LASS) is enabled this weakness may be
exploitable.
Until kernel adds support for LASS[2], only allow LAM for COMPILE_TEST,
or when speculation mitigations have been disabled at compile time,
otherwise keep LAM disabled.
[1] SLAM: https://download.vusec.net/papers/slam_sp24.pdf
[2] LASS: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230609183632.48706-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 1566748f16c4..794517df8068 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -2270,6 +2270,7 @@ config RANDOMIZE_MEMORY_PHYSICAL_PADDING
config ADDRESS_MASKING
bool "Linear Address Masking support"
depends on X86_64
+ depends on COMPILE_TEST || !SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS # wait for LASS
help
Linear Address Masking (LAM) modifies the checking that is applied
to 64-bit linear addresses, allowing software to use of the
base-commit: 0dd3ee31125508cd67f7e7172247f05b7fd1753a
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 2:35 Pawan Gupta [this message]
2024-01-19 4:58 ` kirill.shutemov
2024-01-19 15:36 ` Pawan Gupta
2024-01-19 17:48 ` Sohil Mehta
2024-01-19 16:21 ` Pawan Gupta
2024-01-19 23:36 ` Sohil Mehta
2024-01-19 20:54 ` Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=919b6370a908bb091779ec2eca7ca5e369d57847.1705631230.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--to=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@intel.com \
--cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®