From: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
To: chenyuan_fl@163.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org
Cc: yonghong.song@linux.dev, olsajiri@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chenyuan@kylinos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] bpftool: Refactor config parsing and add CET symbol matching
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 10:58:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91a46a61-4a9c-452b-87ae-b8fb45a2e9f2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b245b389-e057-40d3-8e2a-7cce5c290c63@kernel.org>
2025-09-01 10:32 UTC+0100 ~ Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
> 2025-08-29 07:11 UTC+0100 ~ chenyuan_fl@163.com
>> From: Yuan CHen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> 1. **Refactor kernel config parsing**
>> - Moves duplicate config file handling from feature.c to common.c
>> - Keeps all existing functionality while enabling code reuse
>>
>> 2. **Add CET-aware symbol matching**
>> - Adjusts kprobe hook detection for x86_64 CET (endbr32/64 prefixes)
>> - Matches symbols at both original and CET-adjusted addresses
>>
>> Changed in PATCH v4:
>> * Refactor repeated code into a function.
>> * Add detection for the x86 architecture.
>>
>> Changed int PATH v5:
>> * Remove detection for the x86 architecture.
>>
>> Changed in PATCH v6:
>> * Add new helper patch (1/2) to refactor kernel config reading
>> * Use the new read_kernel_config() in CET symbol matching (2/2) to check CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
>>
>> Changed in PATCH v7:
>> * Display actual kprobe attachment addresses instead of symbol addresses
>
> Hi Yuan,
>
> Is there any difference between v7 and v8 of your series? They seem
> identical, from what I can see.
From Yuan's reply (please let's stick to the ML :) )
> The v7 and v8 patches are identical in code changes. The only update
> in v8 is the addition of "Ack-by" tags in commit messages.
OK thanks for confirming! No need to repost just to add the Ack tags
next time, maintainers can pick them up automatically before applying to
their tree.
Thanks,
Quentin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-29 6:11 chenyuan_fl
2025-08-29 6:11 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] bpftool: Refactor kernel config reading into common helper chenyuan_fl
2025-08-29 6:11 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] bpftool: Add CET-aware symbol matching for x86_64 architectures chenyuan_fl
2025-09-01 9:32 ` [PATCH v8 0/2] bpftool: Refactor config parsing and add CET symbol matching Quentin Monnet
2025-09-01 9:58 ` Quentin Monnet [this message]
2025-09-02 15:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91a46a61-4a9c-452b-87ae-b8fb45a2e9f2@kernel.org \
--to=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenyuan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=chenyuan_fl@163.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®