From: "Sverdlin, Alexander" <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
To: "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "o.rempel@pengutronix.de" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"wbg@kernel.org" <wbg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] counter: interrupt-cnt: Convert atomic_t -> atomic_long_t
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 09:24:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91c00e75bc25267d57863494d638f0a43e499ac4.camel@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250331152222.2263776-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Dear maintainers,
On Mon, 2025-03-31 at 17:22 +0200, A. Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
>
> Convert the internal counter type to atomic_long_t, which:
> - doesn't change much for existing in-tree users as they are 32-bit anyway
> (stm32/i.MX6)
> - doesn't introduce performace penalty on 32-bit platforms
> - provides 64-bit resolution on 64-bit platforms with virtually no
> preformance penalty
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
I've noticed that the patch has been marked as "Changes Requested" in
the patchwork, could it be a mistake? Because I never received any
change request.
> ---
> drivers/counter/interrupt-cnt.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/interrupt-cnt.c b/drivers/counter/interrupt-cnt.c
> index 949598d51575a..8df5457b0a076 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/interrupt-cnt.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/interrupt-cnt.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> #define INTERRUPT_CNT_NAME "interrupt-cnt"
>
> struct interrupt_cnt_priv {
> - atomic_t count;
> + atomic_long_t count;
> struct gpio_desc *gpio;
> int irq;
> bool enabled;
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static irqreturn_t interrupt_cnt_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> struct counter_device *counter = dev_id;
> struct interrupt_cnt_priv *priv = counter_priv(counter);
>
> - atomic_inc(&priv->count);
> + atomic_long_inc(&priv->count);
>
> counter_push_event(counter, COUNTER_EVENT_CHANGE_OF_STATE, 0);
>
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int interrupt_cnt_read(struct counter_device *counter,
> {
> struct interrupt_cnt_priv *priv = counter_priv(counter);
>
> - *val = atomic_read(&priv->count);
> + *val = atomic_long_read(&priv->count);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int interrupt_cnt_write(struct counter_device *counter,
> if (val != (typeof(priv->count.counter))val)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> - atomic_set(&priv->count, val);
> + atomic_long_set(&priv->count, val);
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Alexander Sverdlin
Siemens AG
www.siemens.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-31 15:22 A. Sverdlin
2025-05-02 9:24 ` Sverdlin, Alexander [this message]
2025-05-02 12:19 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-05-05 12:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-05-02 15:11 ` William Breathitt Gray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91c00e75bc25267d57863494d638f0a43e499ac4.camel@siemens.com \
--to=alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wbg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®