From: "Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Bugfix for of_match_node ordering
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:22:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91d21c6c-a87a-46bf-8036-c8f769e32399@VA3EHSMHS018.ehs.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6sg7FpJqAUjkU5DkUpiV_mDbtSV3RETtiQdACUXhRtRrg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Grant,
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 11:29AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Hi Grant,
> >
> > I observe the following boot failure with today's (next-20140220) linux-next
> > tree on Exynos based boards with the default exynos_defconfig.
>
> Ugh, nested locking. that is not good. Kevin's patch looks correct and
> I'll merge it in. I'm a little disturbed though that you're the only
> one who has reported problems. Looking at what it does I would expect
> pretty much every SMP platform for freak out about this, but I've
> heard nothing from the powerpc guys.
>
> I'll merge in the fix of course, but I'd like to know what I'm missing.
FWIW, I see a deadlock on Zynq (ARM) as well. The proposed patch
resolves it. Feel free to add my
Tested-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Sören
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-21 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 14:14 Grant Likely
[not found] ` < 1392819290-1044-3-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org>
[not found] ` < CAK9yfHwwmZkFMRvxsxjBAfUbVXU3V+iPFDZO=DwQsFvJ3NQyKA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-02-19 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Revert "of: search the best compatible match first in __of_match_node()" Grant Likely
2014-02-19 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] of: reimplement the matching method for __of_match_node() Grant Likely
2014-02-19 14:54 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-19 15:34 ` Grant Likely
2014-02-19 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] of: Move testcase FDT data into drivers/of Grant Likely
2014-02-19 14:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] of: Add self test for of_match_node() Grant Likely
2014-02-20 8:39 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Bugfix for of_match_node ordering Sachin Kamat
2014-02-20 10:12 ` Kevin Hao
2014-02-20 10:27 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-02-20 10:55 ` Kevin Hao
2014-02-20 11:13 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-02-20 11:53 ` Grant Likely
2014-02-20 11:29 ` Grant Likely
2014-02-21 1:22 ` Sören Brinkmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91d21c6c-a87a-46bf-8036-c8f769e32399@VA3EHSMHS018.ehs.local \
--to=soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®