From: Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>,
vaibhav.sr@gmail.com, mgreer@animalcreek.com, johan@kernel.org,
elder@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: audio: Check null pointer
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:54:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91f92fda-e8cf-c96d-26b2-56a860ac7cf1@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211224090336.1612305-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
On 12/24/21 3:03 AM, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> As the possible alloc failure of devm_kcalloc, it could return null
> pointer.
> To prevent the dereference of the null pointer, it should be checked.
I think this is a good change, but I would like you to improve
the description, and fix some different bugs introduced by your
change.
What you are specifically doing is checking for a null return
from devm_kcalloc() in gb_generate_enum_strings(), and are
returning the NULL pointer if that occurs. That means you
need to update all the callers of gb_generate_enum_strings()
to also handle a possible null return value.
The fix does a good thing, and your description is correct
about what you are fixing. But it should supply more
complete context for the change.
More below.
> Fixes: e65579e335da ("greybus: audio: topology: Enable enumerated control support")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c
> index 1fc7727ab7be..e9f47a1f0d28 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,11 @@ static const char **gb_generate_enum_strings(struct gbaudio_module_info *gb,
> __u8 *data;
>
> items = le32_to_cpu(gbenum->items);
> +
> strings = devm_kcalloc(gb->dev, items, sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!strings)
> + return NULL;
> +
> data = gbenum->names;
>
> for (i = 0; i < items; i++) {
> @@ -654,7 +658,10 @@ static int gbaudio_tplg_create_enum_kctl(struct gbaudio_module_info *gb,
>
> /* since count=1, and reg is dummy */
> gbe->items = le32_to_cpu(gb_enum->items);
> +
> gbe->texts = gb_generate_enum_strings(gb, gb_enum);
> + if (!gbe->texts)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* debug enum info */
> dev_dbg(gb->dev, "Max:%d, name_length:%d\n", gbe->items,
> @@ -861,7 +868,10 @@ static int gbaudio_tplg_create_enum_ctl(struct gbaudio_module_info *gb,
>
> /* since count=1, and reg is dummy */
> gbe->items = le32_to_cpu(gb_enum->items);
> +
> gbe->texts = gb_generate_enum_strings(gb, gb_enum);
> + if (!gbe->texts)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* debug enum info */
> dev_dbg(gb->dev, "Max:%d, name_length:%d\n", gbe->items,
> @@ -1032,8 +1042,12 @@ static int gbaudio_tplg_create_widget(struct gbaudio_module_info *module,
> csize += offsetof(struct gb_audio_ctl_elem_info, value);
> csize += offsetof(struct gb_audio_enumerated, names);
> csize += le16_to_cpu(gbenum->names_length);
> +
> control->texts = (const char * const *)
> gb_generate_enum_strings(module, gbenum);
> + if (!control->texts)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
You can't simply return here. If you look a bit above this,
where the call to allocate a control structure is done, you
see that a NULL return there jumps to the "error" label, so
any already allocated and initialized control widgets get
cleaned up before returning.
> control->items = le32_to_cpu(gbenum->items);
> } else {
> csize = sizeof(struct gb_audio_control);
> @@ -1181,8 +1195,12 @@ static int gbaudio_tplg_process_kcontrols(struct gbaudio_module_info *module,
> csize += offsetof(struct gb_audio_ctl_elem_info, value);
> csize += offsetof(struct gb_audio_enumerated, names);
> csize += le16_to_cpu(gbenum->names_length);
> +
> control->texts = (const char * const *)
> gb_generate_enum_strings(module, gbenum);
> + if (!control->texts)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
You have basically the same issue here. You can't just return,
you must do some cleanup too.
-Alex
> control->items = le32_to_cpu(gbenum->items);
> } else {
> csize = sizeof(struct gb_audio_control);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-27 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-24 9:03 Jiasheng Jiang
2021-12-27 15:54 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2021-12-28 2:02 Jiasheng Jiang
2021-12-28 14:50 ` Alex Elder
2022-01-06 10:27 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91f92fda-e8cf-c96d-26b2-56a860ac7cf1@ieee.org \
--to=elder@ieee.org \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mgreer@animalcreek.com \
--cc=vaibhav.sr@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®