From: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com>
To: shomenkow@gmail.com,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@kernel.org>,
Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: verisilicon: postproc: fix the G1 input height extension
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 08:34:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <920015edaef1c92d0b22b9f0eb1a47006f901800.camel@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104-b4-hantro-pp-v1-1-1d75e9b225f8@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2771 bytes --]
Le mercredi 04 novembre 2026 à 14:27 +0300, Sergei Khomenkov via B4 Relay a
écrit :
> From: Sergei Khomenkov <shomenkow@gmail.com>
>
> The G1 post-processor takes its input size in macroblocks: the low
> bits in swreg72, the high bits in swreg92 (bits 28:26 for bits 11:9
> of the width, bits 31:29 for bits 10:8 of the height). This is the
> VDPU1 layout in Rockchip's MPP library, whose JPEG decoder writes the
> height extension as ((height / 16) & 0x700) >> 8.
>
> hantro_postproc_g1_enable() computes the width extension that way but
> writes the height extension as MB_HEIGHT(height >> 8), shifting lines
> instead of macroblocks. Every input of 256 to 4080 lines gets an
> extension of 1 instead of 0, so the post-processor is told it has 256
> more macroblock rows than it has: 286 instead of 30 for 480 lines,
> 301 instead of 45 for 720 and 324 instead of 68 for 1080. Inputs
> below 256 lines are not affected.
>
> Shift the macroblock count, as is done for the width.
>
> The problem was found with an LLM coding assistant while porting
> mainline Linux to a Rockchip RK3026 board; the assistant also drafted
> this change. Tested on that board (G1, ID 0x6731), decoding H.264
> (640x480, 854x480, 1280x720) and VP8 (640x480, 1280x720) to YUYV
> through the post-processor, 241 frames, against a software conversion
> of the decoder's NV12 output. Without this change only the 4 VP8 key
> frames match: a few pixels at the bottom left of the last macroblock
> row differ from run to run, and VP8 inter frames propagate them. With
> it all 241 frames match. 320x240 is correct either way.
>
> Fixes: 3f6702e1be8a ("media: verisilicon: postproc: 4K support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Khomenkov <shomenkow@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_postproc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_postproc.c b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_postproc.c
> index e94d1ba5ef10..ecc6b3137eb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_postproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_postproc.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void hantro_postproc_g1_enable(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
> HANTRO_PP_REG_WRITE(vpu, orig_width, MB_WIDTH(ctx->dst_fmt.width));
> HANTRO_PP_REG_WRITE(vpu, display_width, ctx->dst_fmt.width);
> HANTRO_PP_REG_WRITE(vpu, input_width_ext, MB_WIDTH(ctx->dst_fmt.width) >> 9);
> - HANTRO_PP_REG_WRITE(vpu, input_height_ext, MB_HEIGHT(ctx->dst_fmt.height >> 8));
> + HANTRO_PP_REG_WRITE(vpu, input_height_ext, MB_HEIGHT(ctx->dst_fmt.height) >> 8);
Good catch.
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com>
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 11:27 Sergei Khomenkov via B4 Relay
2026-11-04 13:34 ` Nicolas Dufresne [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=920015edaef1c92d0b22b9f0eb1a47006f901800.camel@collabora.com \
--to=nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com \
--cc=hverkuil@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shomenkow@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®