From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933629AbcIAMA3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 08:00:29 -0400 Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:35171 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933186AbcIAMA0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 08:00:26 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee61b-f79466d000001e3c-33-57c818302046 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Mark Rutland Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Remove skeleton.dtsi usage and fix memory node DTC warnings Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:59:34 +0200 Message-id: <9206996.z0QQMGk4HW@amdc1976> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-79-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-reply-to: <20160901114046.GB4220@leverpostej> References: <1472645679-5696-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <11690712.d89FASKYvI@amdc1976> <20160901114046.GB4220@leverpostej> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7Bit Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jQV0DiRPhBkteq1vMP3KO1eLN2zVM Fv2PXzNbnD+/gd3i8q45bBYzzu9jslh6/SKTReveI+wOHB5r5q1h9Ni0qpPNY0v/XXaPz5vk AliiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDIePr3HUtDEX3Fs6j62BsZ73F2MnBwSAiYS9z5dYYGwxSQu3FvP 1sXIxSEkMItR4vGCJijnK6PEu1X/WEGq2ASsJCa2r2IEsUUE1CV6dn0B62YWaGCSaFkDZgsL ZEhMfH4JzGYRUJW42LQArJ5XQFOis2cnE4gtKuAl0bP9EVicU8BAYsKJRVDLuhglTh7exg7R ICjxY/I9qAXyEvv2T2WFsLUk1u88zjSBEehOhLJZSMpmISlbwMi8ilEitSC5oDgpPdcoL7Vc rzgxt7g0L10vOT93EyM43J9J72A8vMv9EKMAB6MSD+8My+PhQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4I0RO hAvxpiRWVqUW5ccXleakFh9ilOZgURLnffx/XZiQQHpiSWp2ampBahFMlomDU6qBMX3T92V2 LC4FkWJbhRdnCUl+t/tzluveD4+GL23CZR5qW9QCv3kFyx6JWrCg77THteMJH1rMCresXZhk Jrra+CZj4VmGyyF9jIJSarmHosWv5l2zW/t+4d7S1QcyHggwRiXnccR+TNKbEXKL+55BypuQ lp83Eop/dF99w8215OknxVVvnPIfKLEUZyQaajEXFScCAG87yKxzAgAA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thursday, September 01, 2016 12:40:46 PM Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:59:48AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Thursday, September 01, 2016 10:35:15 AM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > > On 08/31/2016 07:40 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 03:45:24 PM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > > >> The idea is to get rid of skeleton.dtsi [0], but that will of course take > > > >> time until the dtsi is removed from all the files. So this patch is a step > > > >> in the right direction so at least Exynos is not a blocker to remove it. > > > > > > > > Krzysztof's point is valid. If you are going to convert all DTS/DTSI > > > > then it is okay to apply Exynos specific changes, otherwise the code > > > > should stay as it is currently. > > > > > > > > Exynos won't be a blocker since we have your patches now and they can > > > > be applied when/if needed ;).. > > > > > > Sorry but I disagree. I see no reasons to need this to be an atomic, rather > > > than incremental change. Deprecated things are usually handled by removing > > > the usage and once there are no users, finally removing them. > > > > Yes, given that there is agreement on the direction and people are aware > > of the needed changes. This doesn't seem to be a case yet as there is > > no comment in skeleton.dtsi about being deprecated and other platforms' > > Maintainers are not aware of the need for the change. > > On the DT side we're all agreed that skeleton.dtsi should die. I'll send > a patch adding a note to skeleton.dtsi to make this more obvious, but > that shouldn't be a blocker for removing existing uses. Thank you for clarifying this, I see no problem with applying Javier's Exynos DTS/DTSI changes now. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics