From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756493AbaCESQS (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:16:18 -0500 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:36318 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753753AbaCESQR (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:16:17 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.5+dev To: Jon Ringle Cc: Greg KH , "Ringle, Jonathan" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add option to build with -O3 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Mar 2014 01:19:17 -0500." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <1393977709-9809-1-git-send-email-jringle@gridpoint.com> <20140305050927.GA8534@kroah.com> <20140305060815.GA3432@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1394043282_1583P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:14:42 -0500 Message-ID: <9247.1394043282@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1394043282_1583P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 01:19:17 -0500, Jon Ringle said: > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply > email and destroy all copies of the original message. Is your company willing to indemnify my organization for the costs of tracking down *all* copies of the message (including, but not restricted to, those on backup tapes, copies automatically committed to WORM-based compliance stores by our mail system, and already logically deleted but not yet overwritten blocks on disk), and securely clearing the data sufficient to prevent its recovery by an experienced forensics analyst armed with a subpoena and a "preserve evidence" order? And does your company's clientele realize that in case of a miscue on the part of one of your staff, you're relying on an unknown third party's good will to secure their confidential information, instead of relying on actual cryptography to secure their data? --==_Exmh_1394043282_1583P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBUxdpkQdmEQWDXROgAQKmZQ//f14iQUjs42mqm8367FAbxKans3IElvDK 6x+PLw6C0ZxZDudYRh1wecqVYstewHx1qdON7bxbeIVSesxlWpexPuygqFN+ZfIj MUghk82DptyiOVO4G06ObPYMLEFlZLXdN+Znm6c6Q9Unm2WdH7Wquw23BwwDa8a4 xQZjIQSYW9eoqZnQmcXbU561lG9owWZh6x9kJYgCosNUxNuT8cIZ+hH80SIixZu2 gJhwkpcaVp/U3a+Zn3o4HFN81+fjAaFZg7phJSgCXU+tat27pXnqD3sM5cnk0fMw ZnIDhGNpTH4HyMBmvd9TFxGTCJfO95r/BxbYkcrlB3tjFS/ZVg1C+haAlMBdSsSl zNXfG9Wv14/JbvsQQRj4fnttIEnQlfwQotimSjuAVKc/AUaGgL6nITvGOl/AS34B VtGJlu4t/Ypb6A8TfR/dGTNEXi4SzoQyOeFB/wTov2jv85D52ILOfUyd+oJr8TBv g8RFtiqIS/eCUt0j4rvUbtbriWC2yCq4/7Mui3XX1lBDhEemaV4Xlrh8oQrkanDc akRkdAf1p3i0rQudbEEbjgvZd9ZXMUuPGBE1iO5rtnSj4mwYqR5h3/tYHTzGS0zF 5vFK5etkEvLu5Tfu1o8CbHfag+g9O5W5689BsdJ+tcLqyx9pqTphgeac2/fKQg3l oufyzrKMgN0= =nwcB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1394043282_1583P--