From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754011AbdEQOEL (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2017 10:04:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52284 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751566AbdEQOEJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2017 10:04:09 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 228124E040 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jcm@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 228124E040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jon Masters MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Avoid bus reset for Cavium cn8xxx root ports. Message-Id: <925EB284-D73A-44A4-AAEB-C086041C5A3E@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 10:04:06 -0400 (EDT) References: <20170516001736.4001-1-david.daney@cavium.com> <20170516001736.4001-3-david.daney@cavium.com> <235a9a51-df06-84af-4e5d-b6408ceb0b7d@redhat.com> <3fbbda8a-a6ea-976e-46ba-d23646500b3a@caviumnetworks.com> <1495004825.31562.20.camel@perches.com> To: Joe Perches In-Reply-To: <1495004825.31562.20.camel@perches.com> Cc: David Daney , Auger Eric , David Daney , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Robert Richter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Thread-Topic: Avoid bus reset for Cavium cn8xxx root ports. Thread-Index: 7TMk3TRThsJwiCawEOiD/lA18Y/sBw== X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 17 May 2017 14:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hahahahahaha :) -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On May 17, 2017, at 03:08, Joe Perches wrote: > >> On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 13:29 -0700, David Daney wrote: >> We really need to improve the >> grammatical analysis capabilities of checkpatch.pl, I think I will lay >> the blame there. > > Uh huh. Best of luck. Submit a patch... > > ;) >