From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752464Ab0JVVwn (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:52:43 -0400 Received: from web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.207.67]:33408 "HELO web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752313Ab0JVVwl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:52:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hH0GlHFG94PLzXORWvxiqx1L0XKGZwPZXFW5+iOxGcFyBT6ZKex3gHktlyGeSCjl3etk6BIhT8wAE3kFLDNYyFY12VUehjDxlee2LzSTKWwHx53MgDD/YW9JKoOmcZueh3MaNlaoPGzDh+VLWNgR1gPaKmqLjBaW4wM0KbOc1y8=; Message-ID: <927255.77335.qm@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: bq.AGzgVM1nGkUBG6eu_65_oi1vJ0M7Et6_lIOMbrU23g1H G9gNB.C2SdXkYWCjx0wdApS100Td40R4rdZ7XONDSukhdI53IPfzjYH.dMzo 0IHDvKeEgYEwq4SLY6cxwSLSD3_QKaaKhrO7JJmLnzl4ge8s_qEOxjk_OCXu q0NbjIo8VrBqxE8oUB.ygbWcQGAgl93KI9VVp3N.rU5EJhu7vorN9aqI.67N fBgj9scllMj3QZ3lI7hVOC4M1nV57Q4YtfKE8h7xOjbtiSn5STbcqECe2H13 ZcdpVX3Aumc36K2koCHyqBPlpc2ibuEkmgnVf_bTSCcfmn2ImISwxxls81kc HFAoSzKUGuHc_7UW1Og3nhpQhHlvsTcvq9toGTw-- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:52:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Luben Tuikov Reply-To: ltuikov@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] [USB] Use normalized sense when emulating autosense To: Alan Stern Cc: Greg KH , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- On Fri, 10/22/10, Alan Stern wrote: > Yeah, the new one is better.  I would have preferred > to see fm_ili > explained in a comment, but this is okay. Thanks. I tried to preserve the logic and the comments as much as possible and tried not to introduce neither additional comment nor additional logic. Is this an implicit ACK then? Or does Greg needs an explicit one? Will he or I have to ask for an explicit ACK? From whom else?