From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [117.135.210.3]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B0B2EE99E; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.3 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750260032; cv=none; b=iXg9vGBqM1u5d4U7JY3kfikOFrGfVLBdcZBWCWg7TJJiHI0fqM7EILOOZQ+81ST/VOdppnxTOXoLKR6CEP1Q3/+q5X55z6xD6QKE3KBOgRNDkBJRxvv5HfIt+eedIWZ1zcqD6UI3T4dBU/L67PNEOZnrzBL0duPJmLhjuu0PITE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750260032; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dBMetiDqRwuA7EYSG1BxFLtDf2bO5RsAThvIYbtXxoU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kQPSK16OkKgY2aj72H/EiZ77kUXn1cM+LBl3XLuhlY5fQEbOdDOu5OT22AvhSlX6vHSlh19E+3VifgSCgzKAqvaxOvCtZmca8TKJirXcHz4yZy/YXhJK6AiHIid8bdtFewhFnGeviCiVdyZV+zb2CQhsqX4Er2e3jXQeKeT7Kyg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=qJOXrnFW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.3 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="qJOXrnFW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From: Content-Type; bh=eZXPwb9W2kal/+I9MYTP/YSPhsVDBv6emckwljPlJ/g=; b=qJOXrnFW88lIR1+4/5aE//cQL5bJBvIeY0OkeSwSsC/soyYMWhZdNXghqZnTPv ipJFgM13II3OATtyQxGgHvT+rdM/EdmJCIvrYuRw/uzXsAQYSGOwiDvewqgAvga6 hlFwHrYIC7TfAvEwx9QGfNmGoGvRZuyg13dvKQnnZcsZM= Received: from [IPV6:240e:b8f:919b:3100:8440:da7c:be7e:927f] (unknown []) by gzga-smtp-mtada-g0-0 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wDnT_IR2VJooCEIAQ--.14627S2; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 23:19:46 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <927e3030-756c-4b1b-a797-5f556ba2b101@163.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 23:19:45 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] PCI: dwc: Refactor register access with dw_pcie_clear_and_set_dword helper To: Niklas Cassel Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , lpieralisi@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, mani@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250611204011.GA868320@bhelgaas> Content-Language: en-US From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wDnT_IR2VJooCEIAQ--.14627S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoW7WFy7Ar1rKw4xXrWrJw1DJrb_yoW8Zry5pa yYqa1Yka1DJFWUKF4Iyw15ZFyjq3s3t3sIqrn8J34Utrn8ZrWYgr9ayF4jkr97GrnI9w4a v3yYqas5Ca4YyaDanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07UrnYwUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: rpryjkyvrrlimvzbiqqrwthudrp/1tbiWwlwo2hS1QJYCQAFs4 On 2025/6/18 22:57, Niklas Cassel wrote: > Hello Hans, > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 09:07:40AM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote: >> >> >> On 2025/6/12 04:40, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 12:30:47AM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote: >>>> Register bit manipulation in DesignWare PCIe controllers currently >>>> uses repetitive read-modify-write sequences across multiple drivers. >>>> This pattern leads to code duplication and increases maintenance >>>> complexity as each driver implements similar logic with minor variations. >>> >>> When you repost this, can you fix whatever is keeping this series from >>> being threaded? All the patches should be responses to the 00/13 >>> cover letter. Don't repost until at least a couple of days have >>> elapsed and you make non-trivial changes. >>> >> >> Dear Bjorn, >> >> Every time I send an email to the PCI main list, I will send it to myself >> first, but I have encountered the following problems: >> Whether I send my personal 163 email, Outlook email, or my company's cixtech >> email, only 10 patches can be sent. So in the end, I sent each patch >> separately. >> >> This is the first time I have sent an email with a series of more than 10 >> patches. My configuration is as follows: >> smtpserver = smtp.163.com >> smtpserverport = 25 >> smtpenablestarttlsauto = true >> smtpuser = 18255117159@163.com >> smtppass = xxx >> >> I suspect it's a problem with China's 163 email. Next, I will try to send it >> using the company's environment. Or when I send this series of patches next >> time, I will paste the web link address of each patch in by replying >> 0000-cover-letter.patch. > > Perhaps the git-send-email options --batch-size and --relogin-delay can be > of help to you: > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-send-email#Documentation/git-send-email.txt---batch-sizenum > > Dear Niklas, Wow! Thank you very much for your help. My local test is normal. Best regards, Hans > Kind regards, > Niklas