mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, rkagan@virtuozzo.com, den@virtuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: x86: get rid of pvclock_gtod_copy
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:24:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92d82044-66ee-602a-1f91-76851f34d88e@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504106628-172372-1-git-send-email-dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>

ping!

On 30.08.2017 18:23, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> V5:
>    It was decided to split the series
>    "make L2's kvm-clock stable, get rid of pvclock_gtod_copy in KVM"
>    into two parts to make the changes finer grained:
>      1. get rid of pvclock_gtod_copy in KVM
>      2. make L2's kvm-clock stable
>    This V5 series implements the 1st part. This part gets rid
>    of pvclock_gtod_copy by switching to use the timekeeper functionality
>    being extended. This new scheme doesn't add any new notifiers and keeps
>    using the existing one (see patch 6 description) which had been used by
>    the pvclock_gtod_copy to keep track timekeeper data changes.
> 
>    The 2nd part is being discussed and is going to be sent later on.
> 
> V4:
>    * removed "is stable" function with vague definition of stability
>      there is the only function which does time with cycle stamp getting
>    * some variables renamed
>    * some patches split into smaller once
>    * atomic64_t usage is replaced with atomic_t
>   
> V3:
>    Changing the timekeeper interface for clocksource reading looks like
>    an overkill to achive the goal of getting cycles stamp for KVM.
>    Instead extend the timekeeping interface and add functions which provide
>    necessary data: read clocksource with cycles stamp, check whether the
>    clock source is stable.
> 
>    Use those functions and improve existing timekeeper functionality to
>    replace pvclock_gtod_copy scheme in masterclock data calculation.
> 
> V2:
>    The main goal is to make L2 kvm-clock be stable when it's running over L1
>    with stable kvm-clock.
> 
>    The patch series is for x86 architecture only. If the series is approved
>    I'll do changes for other architectures but I don't have an ability to
>    compile and check for every single on (help needed)
> 
>    The patch series do the following:
> 
>          * change timekeeper interface to get cycles stamp value from
>            the timekeeper
>          * get rid of pvclock copy in KVM by using the changed timekeeper
>            interface: get time and cycles right from the timekeeper
>          * make KVM recognize a stable kvm-clock as stable clocksource
>            and use the KVM masterclock in this case, which means making
>            L2 stable when running over stable L1 kvm-clock
> 
> Denis Plotnikov (6):
>    timekeeper: introduce extended clocksource reading callback
>    timekeeper: introduce boot field in system_time_snapshot
>    timekeeper: use the extended reading function on snapshot acquiring
>    tsc: implement the extended tsc reading function
>    KVM: x86: switch to masterclock update using timekeeper functionality
>    KVM: x86: remove not used pvclock_gtod_copy
> 
>   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   2 +-
>   arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c           |  10 ++
>   arch/x86/kvm/trace.h            |  31 ++---
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 245 +++++++++-------------------------------
>   include/linux/clocksource.h     |  11 +-
>   include/linux/timekeeping.h     |   5 +
>   kernel/time/timekeeping.c       |  17 ++-
>   7 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 217 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Best,
Denis

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-11  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-30 15:23 Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] timekeeper: introduce extended clocksource reading callback Denis Plotnikov
2017-09-25 22:00   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-26 16:51     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-27  8:52       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-27 10:43         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-27 11:53           ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-27 12:14             ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-27 13:45               ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-27  9:18       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] timekeeper: introduce boot field in system_time_snapshot Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] timekeeper: use the extended reading function on snapshot acquiring Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] tsc: implement the extended tsc reading function Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] KVM: x86: switch to masterclock update using timekeeper functionality Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] KVM: x86: remove not used pvclock_gtod_copy Denis Plotnikov
2017-09-11  9:24 ` Denis Plotnikov [this message]
2017-09-18  7:35   ` [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: x86: get rid of pvclock_gtod_copy Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92d82044-66ee-602a-1f91-76851f34d88e@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®