From: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, rkagan@virtuozzo.com, den@virtuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: x86: get rid of pvclock_gtod_copy
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:24:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92d82044-66ee-602a-1f91-76851f34d88e@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504106628-172372-1-git-send-email-dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
ping!
On 30.08.2017 18:23, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> V5:
> It was decided to split the series
> "make L2's kvm-clock stable, get rid of pvclock_gtod_copy in KVM"
> into two parts to make the changes finer grained:
> 1. get rid of pvclock_gtod_copy in KVM
> 2. make L2's kvm-clock stable
> This V5 series implements the 1st part. This part gets rid
> of pvclock_gtod_copy by switching to use the timekeeper functionality
> being extended. This new scheme doesn't add any new notifiers and keeps
> using the existing one (see patch 6 description) which had been used by
> the pvclock_gtod_copy to keep track timekeeper data changes.
>
> The 2nd part is being discussed and is going to be sent later on.
>
> V4:
> * removed "is stable" function with vague definition of stability
> there is the only function which does time with cycle stamp getting
> * some variables renamed
> * some patches split into smaller once
> * atomic64_t usage is replaced with atomic_t
>
> V3:
> Changing the timekeeper interface for clocksource reading looks like
> an overkill to achive the goal of getting cycles stamp for KVM.
> Instead extend the timekeeping interface and add functions which provide
> necessary data: read clocksource with cycles stamp, check whether the
> clock source is stable.
>
> Use those functions and improve existing timekeeper functionality to
> replace pvclock_gtod_copy scheme in masterclock data calculation.
>
> V2:
> The main goal is to make L2 kvm-clock be stable when it's running over L1
> with stable kvm-clock.
>
> The patch series is for x86 architecture only. If the series is approved
> I'll do changes for other architectures but I don't have an ability to
> compile and check for every single on (help needed)
>
> The patch series do the following:
>
> * change timekeeper interface to get cycles stamp value from
> the timekeeper
> * get rid of pvclock copy in KVM by using the changed timekeeper
> interface: get time and cycles right from the timekeeper
> * make KVM recognize a stable kvm-clock as stable clocksource
> and use the KVM masterclock in this case, which means making
> L2 stable when running over stable L1 kvm-clock
>
> Denis Plotnikov (6):
> timekeeper: introduce extended clocksource reading callback
> timekeeper: introduce boot field in system_time_snapshot
> timekeeper: use the extended reading function on snapshot acquiring
> tsc: implement the extended tsc reading function
> KVM: x86: switch to masterclock update using timekeeper functionality
> KVM: x86: remove not used pvclock_gtod_copy
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 10 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/trace.h | 31 ++---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 245 +++++++++-------------------------------
> include/linux/clocksource.h | 11 +-
> include/linux/timekeeping.h | 5 +
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 17 ++-
> 7 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 217 deletions(-)
>
--
Best,
Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-11 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 15:23 Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] timekeeper: introduce extended clocksource reading callback Denis Plotnikov
2017-09-25 22:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-26 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-27 8:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-27 10:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-27 11:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-27 12:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-27 13:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-27 9:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] timekeeper: introduce boot field in system_time_snapshot Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] timekeeper: use the extended reading function on snapshot acquiring Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] tsc: implement the extended tsc reading function Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] KVM: x86: switch to masterclock update using timekeeper functionality Denis Plotnikov
2017-08-30 15:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] KVM: x86: remove not used pvclock_gtod_copy Denis Plotnikov
2017-09-11 9:24 ` Denis Plotnikov [this message]
2017-09-18 7:35 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: x86: get rid of pvclock_gtod_copy Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92d82044-66ee-602a-1f91-76851f34d88e@virtuozzo.com \
--to=dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®