From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761658AbcIWRWr (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:22:47 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:58426 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752150AbcIWRWn (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:22:43 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 78A5461255 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 01/10] Documentation: DT: qcom_hidma: update binding for MSI To: Rob Herring References: <1473960166-30155-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1473960166-30155-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20160923153910.GA23150@rob-hp-laptop> Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, cov@codeaurora.org, vinod.koul@intel.com, jcm@redhat.com, agross@codeaurora.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <92feb6b5-b9b9-394d-3cb6-d095df339ebc@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:22:39 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160923153910.GA23150@rob-hp-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/23/2016 11:39 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> Required properties: >> > -- compatible: must contain "qcom,hidma-1.0" >> > +- compatible: must contain "qcom,hidma-1.0" for initial HW or "qcom,hidma-1.1" >> > +for MSI capable HW. > Do you have an SoC part number yet? If so, please use that instead. > Unfortunately, I have the same problem like "qcom, hidma-1.0". The SoC name is not settled yet and same IP gets used in multiple SoCs. Each IP reports its own version number. This is one of the reasons why I sticked to versioning instead of SoC name. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.