From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com (mail-pl1-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1045E37168; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="UMdi7jfv" Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d3dee5f534so14457555ad.1; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 06:57:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703170662; x=1703775462; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=i3USUl9WO2gcOQwDnVCeaBX3q/QuTE9UFOGfxgimai4=; b=UMdi7jfvHUDGhSCeuYvG2KETN9NFclrIBzSKrD3MEhny89Zmjm1MNEj4wOFQtLRzNH RmeLpmxrO/rMv0usruXt9DWqrgu026crXC628T34xCRR9iWPnbBmuZ3MalQuUcFePQLk J1DRXKZeUAiIdtKk8tcyX+t/jQwgm0B/0kIXa7QD6uJ7ItLFh5NGd0IYENq6SoE0iYyX 9+PrhAaQiZE2QNGjLt9hLCoOwPEcCLbeWLssc0hL/72U9umq0ZDJdA1rsOh5Vt8w5xxb g0SciyQ26Epux4gby/XwUWvzVvdhHi/spoz7KRa84dVQnCWn33PAIs1u5Wzohn3JnMcA 9MEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703170662; x=1703775462; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i3USUl9WO2gcOQwDnVCeaBX3q/QuTE9UFOGfxgimai4=; b=KXhjBK5FS0gq1grFnfOYpfF2k3FCZ3NBwsfFpIqADDd3nRuNYi9bIWZpQIgy2v+epp EuGyc2c9aLe3GujsA/llCc44izClO8ZySVGg3j8RKOW1Etpw+5GDZ7dwAy5Q8wEkG45s yiCnwu6cGBFRmN3UVtO7Dplf8Rk7y4ZHwLZRwAIVbh7T+y2qcwXi9hPlYMIdCVG0ba3T QWW6BDPuHQxi9h/754G0+YShCl7aGOO1xd4isiHJylSf/TOnPUv42v6k1NiK93qrna1/ slEaMC/tYQyLlq6mxRTNMQ7UPDF0x/NUQ4y6IeW7icjTIfTU/x+2ceQvPqJNRrLH9TWf 7zrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzjww0Iuk3nC6JaoFAN2VBWeg36Po5j0v4REHWCEDpd7WLyJWoc IjIgzMbSd09avoRf/jQz7vY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE5wFdUULiCY8ELFxZqWGyGPK5/+XMGldnySVulFribOOOrmtJkIkISv8i7aleKcpl8MtnXpw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:22cf:b0:1d3:cc75:63a4 with SMTP id y15-20020a17090322cf00b001d3cc7563a4mr973865plg.21.1703170662197; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 06:57:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5-20020a170902cec500b001d07ebef623sm1750024plg.69.2023.12.21.06.57.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Dec 2023 06:57:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 06:57:40 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/159] 5.15.145-rc1 review Message-ID: <9307d019-b0ea-41ed-a559-2fb14022295d@roeck-us.net> References: <20231220160931.251686445@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231220160931.251686445@linuxfoundation.org> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 05:07:45PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.145 release. > There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:08:59 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 158 pass: 158 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 525 pass: 525 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck As you may have noticed, the two day response time isn't enough for my testbed, especially if all releases have to be built and if there are multiple release candidates. Guenter