Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: add xiaomi,taoyao-pmic-glink compatible

[Stanislav Zaikin <zstaseg@gmail.com>]

On 9/9/26 11:16 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 02:37:09PM +0200, Stanislav Zaikin wrote:
>> Add the compatible string used by Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G (taoyao) so its
>> battery manager can be matched to a device-specific variant in
>> qcom_battmgr.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Zaikin <zstaseg@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,pmic-glink.yaml | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,pmic-glink.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,pmic-glink.yaml
>> index 16ad4f5698fc..8ca057c4e3e6 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,pmic-glink.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,pmic-glink.yaml
>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ properties:
>>         - items:
>>             - enum:
>>                 - qcom,sm7325-pmic-glink
>> +              - xiaomi,taoyao-pmic-glink
>>             - const: qcom,qcm6490-pmic-glink
>>             - const: qcom,pmic-glink
> 
> Is the implementation compatible with qcom,qcm6490-pmic-glink? The
> driver does not bind that compatible, so I can't tell. Maybe some
> Qualcomm people can answer this question. Please send new version
> without the RFC tag, so that DT binding maintainers review this
> patch series.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> -- Sebastian

Hi,

Thank you for the review.

Yes, we still need qcom,qcm6490-pmic-glink for usci_glink driver 
(there's a quirk that all sm7325-based handset uses: spacewar, dubai).

Will send a new version without RFC tag.

-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav