From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752545AbdJSMgy (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:36:54 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:61159 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752507AbdJSMgw (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:36:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] char/tpm: Less checks in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe() after error detection To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Such=c3=a1nek?= , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Corentin Labbe , Jarkko Sakkinen , Jason Gunthorpe , Jerry Snitselaar , Kenneth Goldman , Michael Ellerman , Nayna Jain , Paul Mackerras , =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_H=c3=bcwe?= , Stefan Berger , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML References: <1d3516a2-a8e6-9e95-d438-f115fac84c7f@users.sourceforge.net> <09a2c3a1-1b10-507d-a866-258b570f6da1@users.sourceforge.net> <20171019135632.4af42743@kitsune.suse.cz> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <9327cc83-448e-8404-af00-73f6409e269e@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:36:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171019135632.4af42743@kitsune.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:g68hRLDZRve4rTbrxidXs33UD7WWeUx79+3aE9XZL4Vq+MHrTbl Grqo595Xgniy7z71xDm8U8pEycwb/F0M088+0LFc7bsM/mcJMdPZj2YkjjNA+roSxGyQell iTNawjrEfoHJQdtUVGKCmlfiKeEY1T7FSPaJvznLObmSxYkvqtoy3bHjpxTqEjQWesE69vO mqvTco7NvSPn3RfB+IDIA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zUIYy6Qfyuo=:2fIKjJzzig6lroowYKuGyn l0mcIRu6pDqzRpT4nNLWRedD+AsYEVulG61lKCzJeYmcuU2IXVM+bjNAKXNPEDbr2Bg/xAhSP ShNZypJ1r2QsBzyOM08YIOAyK6gR67RK7hkq/O+TDNw6NHkb8RIUaQN2RnTXjXI5yQHcLXBuq ySJWG9se/OEkutvsL3Gdqe0XecyMYLH50/D9JMF5CvxrmQfrGstN6AgHZ4RRCnPfaWRl5UBDD 5j1OlsWGRh2wNSSoLNcit2ifRUbhmTjjnnBh015NaWjinGmO7cpG59YbkBoUXx7QpSBy8rMq0 nbbiEAgCz67QKDpNXJeZWP47+k63GIIayM7UqCTM8/lCDYP1oZ/lLaPNNOzJ3evI51WxTnG3u 2WZtXlBIFwTxiXUqfql2/lH8EOU19ec2iCHOu7Yx43vMR/F1MsIrqErtWKuydtXa/E5tUdpjf 8r7h3QE8si7/CU5kw4KFZ06Q2VZb9PuI6ASsl4VVVRl116LqnNeSpmL+o7qq4xGQF8ovSCmuX +mFZznWu9OFxFPjhaMX5TYQz3aY756HxKtxXBr9gWo3ROW0psekaBumBhXtR3sNs4QB+1m7IK XmjSJlug8vciJJvjhuWOsDRZLyTph2fNBi+wzNNw79qGM9+/ahhXWWs7hh/zGAXOJr3KQVRlX U/7mSKYYa8W+3hxrxBS0OhOlIDM+nbLJGBnJmhh+Oju3fs0bra1SGUoljdR7PFy0JmeyqwTe1 sPuuuXcnyqqvPgbsMxUVFXPGfayUcDkrOghOM55DA+tKxliJpp3+RC9ISWR/p+RTpPsyB87jr CafIsQ4I7fACoiHGcNx3rKJjZq91K5k/lLjdwsckUve3g0JZV0= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> @@ -683,13 +683,10 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev, >> reg_crq_cleanup: >> dma_unmap_single(dev, ibmvtpm->crq_dma_handle, >> CRQ_RES_BUF_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); >> -cleanup: >> - if (ibmvtpm) { >> - if (crq_q->crq_addr) >> - free_page((unsigned long)crq_q->crq_addr); >> - kfree(ibmvtpm); >> - } >> - > > I think a single cleanup section is better than many labels that just > avoid a single null check. I proposed to delete two unnecessary condition checks together with an adjustment of jump targets. Regards, Markus