From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A576C433DF for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EC820842 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729081AbgHETxX (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:53:23 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:37637 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728166AbgHEQuV (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:50:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f199.google.com ([209.85.215.199]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3HXC-00086D-8E for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:24:38 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-f199.google.com with SMTP id j37so7398428pgi.16 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 04:24:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lF9ALM9gRuD9sB/pHsvqa0BtUHkbcECALGd1yP2+BEE=; b=IJEMwoI6SX/1go6TKmtcvxt4uNuRFgQs9m+CiC1XT2AoudohhVseJRgurJUMZ4P8Ji yxGmPkiDYDNzMWK1MN/WBNQrlWb5H7Jy9PJxFSyHrj9wCxAwPUzWXuTwhtNeO3OTNG7p 2H9bxSXIlHHL/FLKAoHTyo8pbTObM7BBMR8BR2DPQTnz/7QKOGEwtXrvlfakUOk3Q8NB /QMp8D7vzJWJlTAMH+uKmV2jzU4TcSGACLB+AJyUt6LAjwe+/Ps9GiBmCs8KpFTAfrXh kQtduPHQM3+EJlmMg1dBdfORatzsa91026cx8vmomBtT02PRtDNo8qpg+iEXXY6c8ca+ xYAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531CjqtjqgpgLyJJyRJk07OMiZY0bBqheCdEOLtkHND5FnuZqoVN tQODxChLcTpmxIEpk8t44GP82UkV0u654F7JVU67AajjJRgOGCIKewS0lokf2N9pNSt41tYrsr4 Wn3o41c71qBcUcIBzCDZZwHCIUUJOJA/fajppGpEAbg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9a4c:: with SMTP id x12mr2894370pfj.307.1596626676926; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 04:24:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJvZXSuRgwTlY5y0En/vjiU7lqcs7sM2JL0qxNrQv5cxET1ZLz6FnSZD2pMhacVp3VGxyXoA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9a4c:: with SMTP id x12mr2894345pfj.307.1596626676533; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 04:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.208] (220-133-187-190.HINET-IP.hinet.net. [220.133.187.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i11sm2613913pjv.30.2020.08.05.04.24.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Aug 2020 04:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw88: 8821c: Add RFE 2 support From: Kai-Heng Feng In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:24:32 +0800 Cc: "kvalo@codeaurora.org" , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "open list:REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER (rtw88)" , "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , open list , Andy Huang Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <9330BBA5-158B-49F1-8B7C-C2733F358AC1@canonical.com> References: <20200805084559.30092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> To: Tony Chuang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tony, > On Aug 5, 2020, at 19:18, Tony Chuang wrote: > >> 8821CE with RFE 2 isn't supported: >> [ 12.404834] rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: rfe 2 isn't supported >> [ 12.404937] rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: failed to setup chip efuse info >> [ 12.404939] rtw_8821ce 0000:02:00.0: failed to setup chip information >> > > NACK > > The RFE type 2 should be working with some additional fixes. > Did you tested connecting to AP with BT paired? No, I only tested WiFi. > The antenna configuration is different with RFE type 0. > I will ask someone else to fix them. > Then the RFE type 2 modules can be supported. Good to know that, I'll be patient and wait for a real fix. Kai-Heng > > Yen-Hsuan