mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Stecklina <julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de>
To: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com" <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] initrd: support erofs as initrd
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:17:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <933797c385f2e222ade076b3e8fc5810fa47f5bd.camel@cyberus-technology.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <582bc002-f0c8-4dbb-8fa5-4c10a479b518@linux.alibaba.com>

On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 13:27 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On 2025/3/21 13:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > We've been trying to kill off initrd in favor of initramfs for about
> > two decades.  I don't think adding new file system support to it is
> > helpful.
> > 
> 
> Disclaimer: I don't know the background of this effort so
> more background might be helpful.

So erofs came up in an effort to improve the experience for users of NixOS on
smaller systems. We use erofs a lot and some people in the community just
consider it a "better" cpio at this point. A great property is that the contents
stays compressed in memory and there is no need to unpack anything at boot.
Others like that the rootfs is read-only by default. In short: erofs is a great
fit.

Of course there are some solutions to using erofs images at boot now:
https://github.com/containers/initoverlayfs

But this adds yet another step in the already complex boot process and feels
like a hack. It would be nice to just use erofs images as initrd. The other
building block to this is automatically sizing /dev/ram0:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/3/20/1296

I didn't pack both patches into one series, because I thought enabling erofs
itself would be less controversial and is already useful on its own. The
autosizing of /dev/ram is probably more involved than my RFC patch. I'm hoping
for some input on how to do it right. :)

> 
> Two years ago, I once thought if using EROFS + FSDAX to directly
> use the initrd image from bootloaders to avoid the original initrd
> double caching issue (which is what initramfs was proposed to
> resolve) and initramfs unnecessary tmpfs unpack overhead:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZXgNQ85PdUKrQU1j@infradead.org
> 
> Also EROFS supports xattrs so the following potential work (which
> the cpio format doesn't support) is no longer needed although I
> don't have any interest to follow either):
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190523121803.21638-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com

Thanks for the pointers!

Julian

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-21 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-20 19:28 Julian Stecklina via B4 Relay
2025-03-21  2:08 ` Al Viro
2025-03-21  8:46   ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-21 12:49   ` Julian Stecklina
2025-03-21  5:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-21  5:27   ` Gao Xiang
2025-03-21 13:17     ` Julian Stecklina [this message]
2025-03-21 13:57       ` Gao Xiang
2025-04-07  8:57       ` hch
2025-04-07 11:19         ` Julian Stecklina
2025-04-07 16:05         ` Gao Xiang
2025-08-25 18:27   ` Askar Safin
2025-08-26  7:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 14:21       ` Byron Stanoszek
2025-08-26 15:32         ` Gao Xiang
2025-08-26 16:00           ` Gao Xiang
2025-08-27  9:22           ` Askar Safin
2025-08-27  9:48             ` Gao Xiang
2025-08-27  9:58               ` Gao Xiang
2025-08-28 16:44                 ` Askar Safin
2025-08-28 17:00                   ` Gao Xiang
2025-08-28 17:14                     ` Gao Xiang
2025-08-30 11:49                       ` Askar Safin
2025-08-30 12:23                         ` Gao Xiang
2025-08-26 17:00         ` Askar Safin
2025-03-21  8:48 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-21  9:16 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-21 13:26   ` Julian Stecklina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=933797c385f2e222ade076b3e8fc5810fa47f5bd.camel@cyberus-technology.de \
    --to=julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®