From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751530AbdGZPuy (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:50:54 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56643 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751013AbdGZPux (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:50:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] xen: get rid of paravirt op adjust_exception_frame To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , X86 ML , Boris Ostrovsky , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar References: <20170724142853.26448-1-jgross@suse.com> From: Juergen Gross Message-ID: <93384be6-55b8-47e1-0478-150f9c906605@suse.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:50:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26/07/17 15:48, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> When running as Xen pv-guest the exception frame on the stack contains >> %r11 and %rcx additional to the other data pushed by the processor. >> >> Instead of having a paravirt op being called for each exception type >> prepend the Xen specific code to each exception entry. When running as >> Xen pv-guest just use the exception entry with prepended instructions, >> otherwise use the entry without the Xen specific code. > > I think this is a nice cleanup, but I'm wondering if it would be even > nicer if the Xen part was kept out-of-line. That is, could Xen have > little stubs like: > > xen_alignment_check: > pop %rcx > pop %r11 > jmp alignment_check > > rather than using the macros in entry_64.S that you have? Then you > could adjust set_trap_gate instead of pack_gate and maybe even do > something like: > > #define set_trap_gate(..., name, ...) set_native_or_xen_trap_gate(..., > name, xen_##name, ...) I think I'll have something like: #define pv_trap_entry(name) (xen_pv_domain() ? xen_ ## name : name) and use it like: set_intr_gate(X86_TRAP_AC, pv_trap_entry(alignment_check)); This will avoid having to define macros for all variants of set_intr_gate(), e.g. set_intr_gate_ist(), set_system_intr_gate(). Do you have any objections? Juergen