From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9204AC282DA for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 16:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB35213A2 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 16:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Wt5OaIz/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726573AbfDFQsV (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Apr 2019 12:48:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:46057 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726475AbfDFQsV (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Apr 2019 12:48:21 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id y3so4743052pgk.12 for ; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 09:48:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LzWlk3uF4YZxeG30G1r/CDtXquaEZdEZ1op+LOgeWms=; b=Wt5OaIz/6nkdSVyIIWXvht7qJsuQv/5aPAMo6ank9K37IRr2BxrfUWT8rTAlGa0LuG 3yud7tneOSzUGF30rmCcX/Kh3SnDQ9wy0xCgzNmKo4gT5FOjPWdEnMxxUzgpIiXOrilC yTRuU4x0pdyqEQKixOVshf873uoJLtkElW7B6IkteMe0jj/yOVqQRjpcT+u6XC0RRl7y pDOQwspvqSxE4qD+thdZe2ISVQn0IYkQX00siNZGGGN4Cpmx7z4WO6E8J3ZlsKhurOMd AZbityahrUe9AseMemEwuZuXaB65rO0OmmMY7fg+hULhS6GbwohZhGr1GbqPjn3wMIal 29cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LzWlk3uF4YZxeG30G1r/CDtXquaEZdEZ1op+LOgeWms=; b=fa2tvWRf60lmRmkv+fAJYIcYyKaboXaQHRzbVvqloV0jaERoSkniNPRUhamGDPxilw QkZApPO1wwRBRxFMdMz1/Bp3ritQ/AtDZlvU1KD2wPOBSMbU/1E/RM5nfES7/dOiQRUb 3FeuswXpXecEETFJa3slo28OzSa3ING/92bVETDSgFJ/WbUlidLl6MjHghf3xnmHJri6 jFF7n+eDnCK8xvuCO3Bv1JOxRUe6JnCpQF2plvk6fsekrjGMxlVYRcKcC+tL+in+5TxK jjfLVPFqvl6lphvKEKGfi1zfyLFh6DBHjE1cNOcQH9i/KRmnB5kRTv1cm8ttDHvxUGvG nJQA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUnJBn+xobOl3fVA6aisTwKXn/kh3MtASyywva8tphuBA5URbSD tnxIUIyq5Fsy37HN3g37VVufT6EJWgqRSw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzbk4wZ7+dWW7FDWWdaCxr2e/py5rbIzxDX/FLlVbI0wEWgHgSypA9jrNWFiMZYwPdK1FqQqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:5185:: with SMTP id f127mr19723314pfb.199.1554569300185; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 09:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.121] (66.29.188.166.static.utbb.net. [66.29.188.166]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 17sm34783116pgz.52.2019.04.06.09.48.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Apr 2019 09:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: remove CONFIG_LBDAF To: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-block , Linux List Kernel Mailing References: <20190405160859.5288-1-hch@lst.de> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <93406b28-dd53-8c81-e2e0-71be65b5c6fa@kernel.dk> Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 10:48:17 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/6/19 10:30 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 6:09 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> >> Dropping this option removes a somewhat weird non-default config that >> has cause various bugs or compiler warnings when actually used. > > I'm ok with this, but let's queue it for 5.2, ok? Jens? Certainly, wasn't going to queue it up for 5.1 at this point. I'll stuff it into for-5.2/block -- Jens Axboe