From: "Satish Eerpini" <eerpini@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Installer
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:30:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93655eb70808040400l236aed0bm841744beff4dd4fe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93655eb70808040357m2e2893c5n3deb34012d5f212b@mail.gmail.com>
using make -n does not work well for my purpose , because with that ,
the neat kernel compilation output is gone , and i think it is far
more work to make sense out of the entire details make -n gives .
I rather came up with this idea , though i think it is more time consuming , :
--> enter each directory recursively and parse the Makefile for the
files that would be compiled ,
--> this can be done by comparing the "CONFIG_" options which have
been enabled in .config
--> and then should also make note of the other 'objs' being compiled
for the required objects .
but all this has to be done in a way which minimises the amount of CPU
time the installer takes , because while we are running the make for
the compilation , it itself consumes a lot of CPU cyles . (CC
actually) ,........
another obstacle i have faced is recognising when the Linux image is
being built , and when the compiling enters into the second stage ,
viz , building modules ........ but knowing the total no of modules to
be compiled is simple as it is already given out by kbuild.
what i need to know , is there any method by which the total no of
files to be compiled can be computed internally in the kbuild process
itself , ......
or the second method would be to "echo" markers (basically text
messages) after each stage of the compilation which can be caught by
the installer , ... but i am sure this is not the best of the methods
to be followed , ..........
is this possible ?
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Satish Eerpini wrote:
>>> Replacing the normal build output with something different doesn't make
>>> anything easier.
>>>
>>> Especially considering that your "once the .config file is set" seems to
>>> assume the user already configured the kernel himself...
>>>
>>
>> i am not just trying to replace the output , i am not a stupid to
>> waste my weekend sitting just to replace the output :-),
>> if u are interested , u can check out the entire TODO for the app here
>> http://satish.playdrupal.com/?q=node/2
>>
>> but in the process i am stuck at deciding the no of files that will be
>> compiled , given that representing the entire compilation
>> process as a progress bar , would give a clear idea of " how much is
>> over" and "how much is left" !!!
>
> make -n makes make do a dry-run but kbuild is a pretty complex beast and
> you might have to jump through some loops to get the information you want.
>
> --
> tejun
>
Thanks
Satish
--
http://satish.playdrupal.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-03 20:50 Satish Eerpini
2008-08-03 21:00 ` Adrian Bunk
[not found] ` <93655eb70808032045vd6130e9m147d3e3ae8b159b5@mail.gmail.com>
2008-08-04 3:46 ` Satish Eerpini
2008-08-04 9:25 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <93655eb70808040357m2e2893c5n3deb34012d5f212b@mail.gmail.com>
2008-08-04 11:00 ` Satish Eerpini [this message]
[not found] ` <12fc08bc0808040658g3fda79a6r407401b2e328ebea@mail.gmail.com>
2008-08-04 21:31 ` Satish Eerpini
2008-08-04 14:03 ` Jeff Dike
2008-08-04 21:30 ` Satish Eerpini
2008-08-04 5:03 ` Bob van Manen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93655eb70808040400l236aed0bm841744beff4dd4fe@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eerpini@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome