From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756540AbZEQJEe (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 05:04:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754021AbZEQJEY (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 05:04:24 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.172]:19030 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751872AbZEQJEX (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 05:04:23 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=A9X9XHcU/Bnbu/0tRVkuS5O6hAxaUBUkokMgZRO9ahcFDXIxo3x0FymvXdRdPfpefA oFQ62toDDVDOVxN1g5a/tV5ccdiPsL80NUf/HEq02SLnjiuVy4DeV1M2qYFUV+RXt1vD MhGG/Y8W/EkigIMd1w3jFZWTb3G3opl/FIzro= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4A0FD0AD.4030402@gmail.com> References: <93655eb70905151007v5f9bb34aj34be4b65ffeb02a4@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0905151012x51c19b5cv639cadab1cee3849@mail.gmail.com> <93655eb70905151024o634f8432j6c3db85df1f6ddfc@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0905151120p5aa58318t1765544fbbb695b2@mail.gmail.com> <93655eb70905151938y558bf86flcfb7c6b6b2c171c6@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0905151947j326d31d9k5c7b1074af2b0bf0@mail.gmail.com> <93655eb70905152012j2a40d2e0ta413a5e9dee34d46@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0905152037r614eaf8ft222c7a6294f2e80f@mail.gmail.com> <93655eb70905152352n6f82ef9dubb9b36e5be161ac7@mail.gmail.com> <4A0FD0AD.4030402@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 14:34:23 +0530 Message-ID: <93655eb70905170204k3b39b090u3413b8d00d225ca6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: unresponsiveness on linux desktop during file copy From: Satish Eerpini To: Robert Hancock Cc: Mark Knecht , Rik van Riel , Ray Lee , Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > High iowait during a file copy with no other activity is entirely normal. If > you have a core that has nothing to do but wait for IO to complete, you'll > get iowait time. This isn't indicating a problem. then the responsiveness seemed to be better with Wu Fengguang's patches applied, or when I decreased the swappiness by decreasing the value in /proc/sys/vm/swappiness . So I think I will stick with that, and thanks everyone for the help. thanks Satish -- http://satish.playdrupal.com