Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: move static function from header to referenced file

[Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 10/30/2026 6:21 AM, Omer El Idrissi wrote:
>>> Move static function from header file to only c file it's used in.
>> why? all the drv_ inlines are in driver-ops.h
>>
>> first rule of commit text is to describe the problem you are tying to solve.
>>
>> don't add unnecessary churn to the wireless code.
> 
> i moved it because multiple files include the header and when those are 
> compiled they don't see the tracepoint definition because the next patch 
> ifdef guards it under the same config that enables the only file the 
> static function that uses the tracepoint is called from.
> 
> this static function was only used in that file and i didn't see any 
> obvious reason for it's existance in that header so i moved it to the 
> file where it's used.
> 
> commit messages are kept in the git history. should i send a v2 with a 
> better commit message? or is the patch series problematic otherwise?

I can't speak for Johannes (wireless maintainer) but I would not accept these
patches. There are thousands of patches active in wireless, many of which
solve real problems, so the maintainers usually don't have time for "noise"
patches. I have over 400 patches in my ath.git queue alone.

/jeff