From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 regression fix] printk: For early boot messages check loglevel when flushing the buffer
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 06:53:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93901f2b-91ad-a910-7031-0040b827a3af@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180905023522.GA1444@jagdpanzerIV>
Hi,
On 05-09-18 04:35, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On (09/04/18 20:01), Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Commit 375899cddcbb ("printk: make sure to print log on console."), moved
>> the checking of the loglevel of messages from flush time to the actual
>> log time.
>>
>> This introduces one problem, some early boot messages are printed before
>> parse_early_param() gets called and thus before kernel commandline options
>> such as quiet, loglevel and ignore_loglevel are parsed.
>
> Do you use earlycon?
No, I'm seeing this with the regular/normal console stuff.
>> This causes e.g. the following messages to get printed on x86 systems,
>> despite the presence of the "quiet" option:
>>
>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000057fff] usable
>> ...
>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x0000000874ffffff] usable
>>
>> This commit fixes this by setting a new LOG_CHK_LEVEL on early boot
>> messages and doing the loglevel check for these while flushing as before.
>>
>
> Hmm, OK, chances are we need to re-think 375899cddcbb. It might be
> the case that we sort of broke CON_PRINTBUFFER handling.
>
> console_loglevel = CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_MOTORMOUTH
> register CON_PRINTBUFFER console
> -> no debug output
>
> So I think that when console_unlock() re-flushes already seen logbuf
> messages to a newly registered exclusive [CON_PRINTBUFFER] console we
> probably need to look at the current console_loglevel in console_unlock()
> loop.
So if it breaks quiet and the above use-case maybe we should revert
375899cddcbb for now?
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-05 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-04 18:01 Hans de Goede
2018-09-05 2:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05 4:53 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2018-09-05 5:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05 5:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05 8:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-05 11:02 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-05 15:20 ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-06 14:31 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-06 7:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-06 14:28 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-07 4:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-10 14:57 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-10 15:02 ` Hans de Goede
2018-09-11 2:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-11 8:47 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-12 7:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-12 13:33 ` Petr Mladek
2018-09-13 2:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-09-06 14:34 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93901f2b-91ad-a910-7031-0040b827a3af@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maninder1.s@samsung.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®