From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>, hupu <hupu.gm@gmail.com>,
<kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v21 2/6] sched/locking: Add blocked_on_state to provide necessary tri-state for proxy return-migration
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 09:08:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93f47a95-6205-41c0-b0f9-8cd92f79e56c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANDhNCo87Xq1-5vhVCyZ3780J+_tGVAjT4d=Z13WsfyQh3oaYw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello John,
On 9/19/2025 4:37 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 2:05 AM K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> wrote:
>> On 9/4/2025 5:51 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>>> @@ -815,6 +815,12 @@ struct kmap_ctrl {
>>> #endif
>>> };
>>>
>>> +enum blocked_on_state {
>>> + BO_RUNNABLE,
>>> + BO_BLOCKED,
>>> + BO_WAKING,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> struct task_struct {
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
>>> /*
>>> @@ -1234,6 +1240,7 @@ struct task_struct {
>>> struct rt_mutex_waiter *pi_blocked_on;
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> + enum blocked_on_state blocked_on_state;
>>
>> Is there any use of the "blocked_on_state" outside of CONFIG_PROXY_EXEC?
>> If not, should we start thinking about putting the proxy exec specific
>> members behind CONFIG_PROXY_EXEC to avoid bloating the task_struct?
>
> So yeah, your suggestion is a decent one, though it gets a little
> messy in a few spots. I'm working on integrating this and propagating
> it through the full series, and hopefully I can clean it up further.
> There are a few spots where this and other proxy related values do get
> checked, so wrapping those up so they can be ifdef'ed out will require
> some extra logic.
Looking at the proxy-exec-6.17-rc4, most of the direct references to
"p->blocked_on_state" is already under CONFIG_PROXY_EXEC. Only the
functions that modify it needs a stub and a helper for the usage in
task_is_blocked()
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 0:21 [RESEND][PATCH v21 0/6] Donor Migration for Proxy Execution (v21) John Stultz
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [RESEND][PATCH v21 1/6] locking: Add task::blocked_lock to serialize blocked_on state John Stultz
2025-09-12 5:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-18 19:58 ` John Stultz
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [RESEND][PATCH v21 2/6] sched/locking: Add blocked_on_state to provide necessary tri-state for proxy return-migration John Stultz
2025-09-15 8:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-18 22:57 ` John Stultz
2025-09-19 3:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-23 23:34 ` John Stultz
2025-09-15 9:03 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-18 23:07 ` John Stultz
2025-09-19 3:38 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [RESEND][PATCH v21 3/6] sched: Add logic to zap balance callbacks if we pick again John Stultz
2025-09-15 8:31 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-19 18:34 ` John Stultz
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [RESEND][PATCH v21 4/6] sched: Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration) John Stultz
2025-09-15 10:06 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-20 2:38 ` John Stultz
2025-09-22 4:14 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [RESEND][PATCH v21 5/6] sched: Add blocked_donor link to task for smarter mutex handoffs John Stultz
2025-09-04 0:21 ` [RESEND][PATCH v21 6/6] sched: Migrate whole chain in proxy_migrate_task() John Stultz
2025-09-11 13:59 ` [RESEND][PATCH v21 0/6] Donor Migration for Proxy Execution (v21) Juri Lelli
2025-09-11 23:21 ` John Stultz
2025-09-12 8:14 ` Juri Lelli
2025-09-16 3:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-16 4:57 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93f47a95-6205-41c0-b0f9-8cd92f79e56c@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hupu.gm@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®