From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE379C433F5 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 09:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233652AbhLGJPs (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 04:15:48 -0500 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.122]:35376 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233625AbhLGJPq (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2021 04:15:46 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 277413F19E for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 09:12:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1638868335; bh=GaOIt/pSSnxls48YeUnnQvYgi4Owp7/cq1T2WhbsgYA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=vkulWaNHv5e6cXMmJC8Tntffc7KXOOld1iynXVfIeIjk1vZQR+a3W2crGy7yEJE8x 9W8yU3Oh1dsIliz9IKPozglVplhEle6nXyLwqpWAcUA42Zk/4fzkiP2xPbAjc2gd26 7NsPzHo1bR80z4mNen1TETJX1EQLuKRClfe9OUUo/A2S8JcOICjwDm5Q6JN91iAzJR otsZlSKeNY5lMn4WRYZY8Bq2nl5RKn54K0RaURkyrNu4xXYSLKL6acVu5uADJjW4hw S9/6CJfYV2Ao7FcBBHiUHrMjQ7pjjGTzQYLRnXLmCORVZd2mcCI0ymR2g4L5SbVh3j rDo9fKN54nZOA== Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id o11-20020a056512230b00b0041ca68ddf35so1680992lfu.22 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 01:12:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GaOIt/pSSnxls48YeUnnQvYgi4Owp7/cq1T2WhbsgYA=; b=UFikVsdQMX0u/rD2WLa283AgqNFwgqjjL+K06BZp5Jwq71U+Z3DHXjnSCgoxcQTjs0 qpUkIFg8CoxTQzetCvMaBes2Cxh2yk6BM3UNC1l/xcIwkZ8XMZz+Us3krGNDDy0K2PSa cs0r0dwRXRA4uSTUYElgZ2YTzDvcN9znNXYSBvGrOqzXC6bawRE44UQpNwi8zmLG5svH bzKFJnFueHGNrF+rFlhCL536OJ0myGXfSczmozjmgWr4En9Pe1+h6W6SFDq2vlxTMqpg JB3tlt6nxT5rihiMNjbZvaYax9WVRjZS0+aWT1zDKiwawGYgNTti5NUWOgVFCFiEjyEg LS4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fiZflZGgQajSb3hobfEPEgDEEjcIuW/q8BNG6Ixz4+hVJEFE/ 5/Y0avnoMqcc34K1esiLvLo/nzPrgDPhg2LM3zsa7xmXuqDdZ+3ct9rhO3UjcxKIWdjf/sP0aTW TqP0FtJILCjkLDQl/WXsgIrC7pkgPDuL/5qBI0kwYqg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:95d3:: with SMTP id y19mr41718552ljh.175.1638868334645; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 01:12:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoosoQHLil3eUjvo4iMu1SXp7cmiktaSPpGa0qP5LvgOU5irMTlVL8Bg9LA4mGAsqDJxeHsg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:95d3:: with SMTP id y19mr41718538ljh.175.1638868334490; Tue, 07 Dec 2021 01:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.3.67] (89-77-68-124.dynamic.chello.pl. [89.77.68.124]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm1620472lfr.304.2021.12.07.01.12.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Dec 2021 01:12:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9400d57e-7db7-0f58-b391-417e103576cd@canonical.com> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:12:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Drop incorrect unevaluatedProperties Content-Language: en-US To: Rob Herring , Tony Lindgren , Roger Quadros Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Thierry Reding , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211206174215.2297796-1-robh@kernel.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20211206174215.2297796-1-robh@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/12/2021 18:42, Rob Herring wrote: > With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, the TI GPMC example > has a warning: > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-onenand.example.dt.yaml: memory-controller@6e000000: onenand@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible', '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'partition@0', 'partition@100000' were unexpected) > > The child node definition for GPMC is not a complete binding, so specifying > 'unevaluatedProperties: false' for it is not correct and should be > dropped. > > Fixup the unnecessary 'allOf' while we're here. > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Cc: Tony Lindgren > Cc: Roger Quadros > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > Looks good. Rob, do you want to take it via your tree or I should handle it? Best regards, Krzysztof