From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E6DA2EC543; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757322367; cv=none; b=rkevokLgmgErbLqXjQUYAoQcxxJqF0BIlF7YLr52G/FRvdPpDngtBeFh7hqmyOknXpzL5nuWtytna7rAicZ5whu129BEt05QSJADzfwcr35l/wBWimum6fdfg+eXPNZIj+mUMJBbDEf5eCP3OlxizubYOXti4Q/glAaCRofIgXs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757322367; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ng/UvLyp5kkP+RWA5z3Vs3tWg2c/GeleARlDyjY7mLQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=bS2PE2A04Cxw3GB65+d8PedHopX3IVXn55yc4WvcJM/iAIpocRDLY3F9JNlGQ4zxFbQlGY4KpsehyyesxaQfiNimzlYUN3XabP2csQ2GwikFit2/zUsmKyzyCo9MbAu27JkP/XCAOTyzKORZPrnDC0c4mRPdBKaOycIWMweRXS8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tg3cx/6R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tg3cx/6R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABC52C4CEFE; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:06:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757322367; bh=ng/UvLyp5kkP+RWA5z3Vs3tWg2c/GeleARlDyjY7mLQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=tg3cx/6RZlSuZ8ZBZFbtH2rkQOUvsrE1ji1QgRI6ZR0U4JCmb7UAbUE4Tkrf2yC5M puyUFtNvn3HJ7FSlkdfRX0u0fG7gbX8wo+/1+ZdHDor1tWDzzRUc8j5Bn1uQl5ZaW9 HNpBKd+tUd+AlPEmIvXnWE9Se5+Qs8qbpGFqy6XE0DyZKNE/YBs0USbpZlVvYT+eWS H8TqmGbZjZ4TFysj/+2smN90Dk7pJrkBeq072V8nxeBsKGyga1/Jeow31aYM9mauT1 BvWfpXXyBeydiMqqy1hhuvMUKpchlYGO6taC/zAzzZshL52MNwvdR1cR06OmfQpxib My61jS/6nCQmg== Message-ID: <94252007-f389-41d0-b5a0-ed948225543a@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 11:06:02 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: rbtree: add immutable cursor To: Alice Ryhl Cc: Vitaly Wool , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , Bjorn Roy Baron , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Trevor Gross , =?UTF-8?Q?Onur_=C3=96zkan?= References: <20250906140256.3059395-1-vitaly.wool@konsulko.se> From: Danilo Krummrich Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/8/25 10:47 AM, Alice Ryhl wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2025 at 04:02:56PM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote: >> + // SAFETY: `best` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. >> + let links = unsafe { addr_of_mut!((*best.as_ptr()).links) }; > > Since this is rawptr to rawptr, I don't think it matters but it seems > more natural to use addr_of! here. Why not use &raw? Consistency with the rest of the file?