From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754256AbcIEG2m (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2016 02:28:42 -0400 Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:44723 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750776AbcIEG2k (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2016 02:28:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: compress lines for immediate return To: Heiko Schocher , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <1473051597-30078-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , Adrian Hunter , Masahiro Yamada , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <94271caf-4852-1d08-c6a0-102aac22ab65@nod.at> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 08:28:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1473051597-30078-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Heiko, On 05.09.2016 06:59, Heiko Schocher wrote: > fix the following code: > > -ret = expression; > -if (ret) > - return ret; > -return 0; > +return expression; "Fix"? ;-) What was broken? I agree that we can write the expression in a different way, but is it really worth it? Is this part of a tree-wide cleanup? Thanks, //richard