From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org (mout-p-102.mailbox.org [80.241.56.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4A7E47CA94; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 14:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788533633; cv=none; b=my3dI42O9xYM4WSZfur9lhUCWDX/9ENPn2FmTiKIat5iW2HA5bOOjKciXEjY9Nj71GVaGmFycebYx7v1vGBOCzRqz5bytJj+ZeqKv8+KxP39/3iRwbKD4zJF56hOxlk5zk2Lmy0JXgUlrw+stln5EiEKwR1paC6zv4ylRfN/Y7c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788533633; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZGTLtABEhINQzYngP28TMwkXTR8rlDih1VqaPGeKb8I=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=hW6EF6q3vWe9aYR4GwAhEcTk+4Ylum4NGOUfBu6MvgEds5kGUmori80HD5jxbAtrOqNW6zmgHlfjf9GGZdwxh8toDjWwPbkc1fFfP/73i+64P6MgIT3r+MI5bUbUlrtlBDnZopd5WkVc4yddkFU7ySkisdc7OGrY8IUPyja+4bQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=wrVmmDPQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="wrVmmDPQ" Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hbzxQ5GBkzKrtJ; Fri, 04 Sep 2026 16:53:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1788533626; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZGTLtABEhINQzYngP28TMwkXTR8rlDih1VqaPGeKb8I=; b=wrVmmDPQx+YJz2dw6TdmRh/X5iFY8+TLtr+OEGJe474CJ1CxU075rk21D30wOGsOVFLpsn BR5bbY53VUIpRZKKWEftnDVozUifLFv04P0umwtNn6NEqcB1nlyXYRKpaznkVwMmV670TU TfraKsL2XMJoj2Wh5aj2jGdac/ozwcuTkahdxztSk/l0PzccGyenxsEpCEY9AxF2ktrZ2i cB1k3c9ltOZf0oC5AqiB0J4YH914eNQ97CVnkQODw3IPl9w+Di0ETgrh/KdW0BhhxITYDe 2aReXcQzoFHRh342gs5bS6V+hBlpz1lZ6bZgR2RVQ/xerekWSNiIBvKimMftbw== Message-ID: <942969bc8813265290da274865a9290adf5f1f8b.camel@mailbox.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] docs: verify/bisect: fix typos, formating and punctuation From: Manuel Ebner To: Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , Thorsten Leemhuis , Shuah Khan Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 16:53:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874ig52k2t.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> References: <20260903154336.732305-3-manuelebnerli@mailbox.org> <4c379bf7-e518-4a06-8b12-134f39a45785@infradead.org> <6ba88e25314a5818f8fb31dc3a2165f6786e890d.camel@mailbox.org> <874ig52k2t.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MBO-RS-META: 1ud5xehmb58doia85zuisgrhkiouiu1f X-MBO-RS-ID: 8cc7d83d1837cd4444e On Fri, 2026-09-04 at 07:59 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Manuel Ebner writes: >=20 > > On Thu, 2026-09-03 at 09:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > Hi Manual, > > >=20 > > > On 9/3/26 8:43 AM, Manuel Ebner wrote: > > > > Improve readability. > > > >=20 > > > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Ebner > > > > Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap > > >=20 > > > It looks like you might be misusing the Reviewed-by: tag here. > > > My only reply (to v1 of this patch) was: > > > =C2=A0 https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/0475c09c-e165-41a5-b654-5c6a= efeaab0b@infradead.org/ > >=20 > > My thought process was: when I include all you suggestions and your mes= sage ends with > > > All of the other changes LGTM. > >=20 > > you are good with the result. Thus Reviewed. >=20 > Just to emphasize this: you do *not* get to make up Reviewed-by tags; if > it is not explicitly given to you by the person involved, it does not > exist. Understood. Manuel > jon