From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/28] mfd: arizona: Remove #ifdef guards for PM related functions
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 10:53:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94394206-a018-27b0-5a21-97976fc4a3bc@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220807145247.46107-21-paul@crapouillou.net>
On 07/08/2022 15:52, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Only export the arizona_pm_ops if CONFIG_PM is set, but leave the
> suspend/resume functions (and related code) outside #ifdef guards.
>
> If CONFIG_PM is not set, the arizona_pm_ops will be defined as
> "static __maybe_unused", and the structure plus all the callbacks will
> be automatically dropped by the compiler.
>
> The advantage is then that these functions are now always compiled
> independently of any Kconfig option, and thanks to that bugs and
> regressions are easier to catch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
> ---
> drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> drivers/mfd/arizona-i2c.c | 2 +-
> drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> index cbf1dd90b70d..c1acc9521f83 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,6 @@ static int wm5102_clear_write_sequencer(struct arizona *arizona)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> static int arizona_isolate_dcvdd(struct arizona *arizona)
__maybe_unused?
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -742,9 +741,7 @@ static int arizona_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
__maybe_unused?
>
> return 0;
> }
> -#endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int arizona_suspend(struct device *dev)
__maybe_unused?
> {
> struct arizona *arizona = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -784,17 +781,21 @@ static int arizona_resume(struct device *dev)
__maybe_unused?
>
> return 0;
> }
> -#endif
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PM
> +static __maybe_unused
> +#endif
No need to ifdef a __maybe_unused.
> const struct dev_pm_ops arizona_pm_ops = {
> - SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(arizona_runtime_suspend,
> - arizona_runtime_resume,
> - NULL)
> - SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(arizona_suspend, arizona_resume)
> - SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(arizona_suspend_noirq,
> - arizona_resume_noirq)
> + RUNTIME_PM_OPS(arizona_runtime_suspend,
> + arizona_runtime_resume,
> + NULL)
> + SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(arizona_suspend, arizona_resume)
> + NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(arizona_suspend_noirq,
> + arizona_resume_noirq)
> };
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arizona_pm_ops);
> +#endif
This ifdeffing is ugly. Why must the structure only be exported if
CONFIG_PM is set?
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static int arizona_of_get_core_pdata(struct arizona *arizona)
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-i2c.c
> index 6d83e6b9a692..8799d9183bee 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-i2c.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arizona_i2c_of_match[] = {
> static struct i2c_driver arizona_i2c_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "arizona",
> - .pm = &arizona_pm_ops,
> + .pm = pm_ptr(&arizona_pm_ops),
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(arizona_i2c_of_match),
> },
> .probe = arizona_i2c_probe,
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c
> index 941b0267d09d..da05b966d48c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-spi.c
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arizona_spi_of_match[] = {
> static struct spi_driver arizona_spi_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "arizona",
> - .pm = &arizona_pm_ops,
> + .pm = pm_ptr(&arizona_pm_ops),
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(arizona_spi_of_match),
> .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(arizona_acpi_match),
> },
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-08 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-07 14:52 [PATCH 00/28] mfd: Remove #ifdef guards for PM functions Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 01/28] mfd: 88pm80x: Remove #ifdef guards for PM related functions Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 02/28] mfd: aat2870: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 03/28] mfd: adp5520: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-08 7:46 ` Hennerich, Michael
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 04/28] mfd: max8925-i2c: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 05/28] mfd: mt6397-irq: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 06/28] mfd: pcf50633: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 07/28] mfd: rc5t583-irq: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 08/28] mfd: stpmic1: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 09/28] mfd: ucb1x00: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 10/28] mfd: 88pm860x: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 11/28] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 15:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-07 15:58 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-08-08 11:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-08 12:13 ` Lee Jones
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 12/28] mfd: mcp-sa11x0: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 13/28] mfd: sec: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-08 9:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-08-08 9:28 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-08-08 10:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-08-08 10:14 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-08-09 15:33 ` Lee Jones
2022-08-09 15:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-08-09 17:26 ` Lee Jones
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 14/28] mfd: sm501: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 15/28] mfd: tc6387xb: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 16/28] mfd: tps6586x: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 17/28] mfd: wm8994: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 18/28] mfd: max77620: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 19/28] mfd: t7l66xb: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 20/28] mfd: arizona: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 17:33 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-08 9:53 ` Richard Fitzgerald [this message]
2022-08-08 10:06 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-08-08 10:43 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-08-08 11:01 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-08-08 14:00 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-08-08 14:47 ` Lee Jones
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 21/28] mfd: max14577: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-08 9:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-08-08 10:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 22/28] mfd: max77686: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-08 9:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-08-08 10:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 23/28] mfd: motorola-cpcap: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 24/28] mfd: sprd-sc27xx: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 25/28] mfd: stmfx: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 16:00 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-07 18:15 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 26/28] mfd: stmpe: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 16:42 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-07 17:13 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 27/28] mfd: tc3589x: " Paul Cercueil
2022-08-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 28/28] mfd: tc6393xb: " Paul Cercueil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94394206-a018-27b0-5a21-97976fc4a3bc@opensource.cirrus.com \
--to=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®