From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>, hupu <hupu.gm@gmail.com>,
Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>,
"zhidao su (Xiaomi)" <soolaugust@gmail.com>,
Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>,
"Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere)" <sh@gentwo.org>,
<kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v33 3/7] sched/core: Activate blocked donor when no owner is found
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:32:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <943cc0a1-1547-486b-97fb-7000ae8b8190@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <atxtWdx0nqTRAAYw@gpd4>
Hello Andrea,
On 10/24/2026 2:03 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
>> @@ -7013,11 +7026,11 @@ find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, struct rq_flags *rf)
>> struct mutex *mutex = p->blocked_on;
>> if (!mutex) {
>> clear_task_blocked_on(p, mutex);
>> - if (task_current(rq, p)) {
>> + if (task_current(rq, p) || p->wake_cpu == task_cpu(p)) {
>> p->is_blocked = 0;
>> return p;
>> }
>> - goto deactivate;
>> + goto activate;
>> }
>
> IIUC, p here isn't necessarily the donor, after the first iteration it
> can be an intermediate owner that is queued on this rq and blocked
> itself. If its blocked_on was cleared by a handoff (or its mutex has no
> owner, below), we now return it when p->wake_cpu == task_cpu(p),
> skipping the sched_cpu_cookie_match() check at the end of the function.
>
> So with CONFIG_SCHED_CORE enabled, are we running a task that was never
> cookie-checked by the core-wide pick?
You are right! I guess we should consolidate all the "return p" bits
to jump to the sched_cpu_cookie_match() check.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 22:04 [PATCH v33 0/7] Sleeping Owner Handling for Proxy Execution (v33) John Stultz
2026-10-23 22:04 ` [PATCH v33 1/7] sched/psi: Preserve sleep-persistent PSI flags on off-CPU sleeping dequeues John Stultz
2026-10-24 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-26 5:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-26 4:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-26 5:16 ` Zhan Xusheng
2026-10-23 22:04 ` [PATCH v33 2/7] sched/core: Use the scheduling context for remote ticks John Stultz
2026-10-24 13:44 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-23 22:04 ` [PATCH v33 3/7] sched/core: Activate blocked donor when no owner is found John Stultz
2026-10-24 8:33 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-26 3:02 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-10-23 22:04 ` [PATCH v33 4/7] sched/proxy: Set TASK_RUNNING when shortcuting return migration John Stultz
2026-10-24 8:36 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-26 3:09 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-23 22:04 ` [PATCH v33 5/7] sched/proxy: Break cyclic proxy chains by deactivating blocked tasks John Stultz
2026-10-24 21:19 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-23 22:04 ` [PATCH v33 6/7] sched/proxy: Detect cycles in proxy walks earlier John Stultz
2026-10-24 15:34 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-23 22:04 ` [PATCH v33 7/7] sched/proxy: Add deactivated (sleeping) owner handling to find_proxy_task() John Stultz
2026-10-24 9:07 ` Andrea Righi
2026-10-26 4:26 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-10-26 7:40 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=943cc0a1-1547-486b-97fb-7000ae8b8190@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hupu.gm@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sh@gentwo.org \
--cc=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=soolaugust@gmail.com \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®