From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: libaokun@huaweicloud.com, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@kernel.org
Cc: hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, zhujia.zj@bytedance.com,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yangerkun@huawei.com,
houtao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, wozizhi@huawei.com,
Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 22:15:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <943db365-f5e7-4fdc-9f00-d2cd00f527d7@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240522114308.2402121-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
On 5/22/24 7:42 PM, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>
> We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
> command:
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
> Write of size 4 at addr ffff888109164a80 by task ondemand-04-dae/4962
>
> CPU: 11 PID: 4962 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-dirty #542
> Call Trace:
> kasan_report+0x94/0xc0
> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
> vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
> ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0
>
> Allocated by task 626:
> __kmalloc+0x1df/0x4b0
> cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x24d/0x690
> cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
> cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
> cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
> cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
> fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
> [...]
>
> Freed by task 626:
> kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
> cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x568/0x690
> cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
> cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
> cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
> cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
> fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
> [...]
> ==================================================================
>
> Following is the process that triggers the issue:
>
> mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
> cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
> REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
> wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
>
> cachefiles_daemon_read
> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
> REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
> cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
> copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
> process_open_req(REQ_A)
> ------ restore ------
> cachefiles_ondemand_restore
> xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
> xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);
>
> cachefiles_daemon_read
> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
> REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
>
> write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size));
> cachefiles_ondemand_copen
> xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
> complete(&REQ_A->done)
> kfree(REQ_A)
> cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(REQ_A)
> fd = get_unused_fd_flags
> file = anon_inode_getfile
> fd_install(fd, file)
> load = (void *)REQ_A->msg.data;
> load->fd = fd;
> // load UAF !!!
>
> This issue is caused by issuing a restore command when the daemon is still
> alive, which results in a request being processed multiple times thus
> triggering a UAF. So to avoid this problem, add an additional reference
> count to cachefiles_req, which is held while waiting and reading, and then
> released when the waiting and reading is over.
>
> Note that since there is only one reference count for waiting, we need to
> avoid the same request being completed multiple times, so we can only
> complete the request if it is successfully removed from the xarray.
>
> Fixes: e73fa11a356c ("cachefiles: add restore command to recover inflight ondemand read requests")
> Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/cachefiles/internal.h | 1 +
> fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
> index d33169f0018b..7745b8abc3aa 100644
> --- a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static inline bool cachefiles_in_ondemand_mode(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
> struct cachefiles_req {
> struct cachefiles_object *object;
> struct completion done;
> + refcount_t ref;
> int error;
> struct cachefiles_msg msg;
> };
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
> index 4ba42f1fa3b4..c011fb24d238 100644
> --- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@
> #include <linux/uio.h>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> +static inline void cachefiles_req_put(struct cachefiles_req *req)
> +{
> + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref))
> + kfree(req);
> +}
> +
> static int cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release(struct inode *inode,
> struct file *file)
> {
> @@ -330,6 +336,7 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache,
>
> xas_clear_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);
> cache->req_id_next = xas.xa_index + 1;
> + refcount_inc(&req->ref);
> xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
>
> id = xas.xa_index;
> @@ -356,15 +363,22 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache,
> complete(&req->done);
> }
>
> + cachefiles_req_put(req);
> return n;
>
> err_put_fd:
> if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN)
> close_fd(((struct cachefiles_open *)msg->data)->fd);
> error:
> - xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id);
> - req->error = ret;
> - complete(&req->done);
> + xas_reset(&xas);
> + xas_lock(&xas);
> + if (xas_load(&xas) == req) {
> + req->error = ret;
> + complete(&req->done);
> + xas_store(&xas, NULL);
> + }
> + xas_unlock(&xas);
> + cachefiles_req_put(req);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -395,6 +409,7 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(struct cachefiles_object *object,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + refcount_set(&req->ref, 1);
> req->object = object;
> init_completion(&req->done);
> req->msg.opcode = opcode;
> @@ -456,7 +471,7 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(struct cachefiles_object *object,
> wake_up_all(&cache->daemon_pollwq);
> wait_for_completion(&req->done);
> ret = req->error;
> - kfree(req);
> + cachefiles_req_put(req);
> return ret;
> out:
> /* Reset the object to close state in error handling path.
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-23 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-22 11:42 [PATCH v3 00/12] cachefiles: some bugfixes and cleanups for ondemand requests libaokun
2024-05-22 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] cachefiles: add output string to cachefiles_obj_[get|put]_ondemand_fd libaokun
2024-05-22 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] cachefiles: remove requests from xarray during flushing requests libaokun
2024-05-22 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd() libaokun
2024-05-23 14:15 ` Jingbo Xu [this message]
2024-05-22 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read() libaokun
2024-05-22 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] cachefiles: remove err_put_fd label " libaokun
2024-05-23 14:21 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-22 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] cachefiles: add consistency check for copen/cread libaokun
2024-05-23 14:28 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-24 2:28 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-27 13:33 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-22 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] cachefiles: add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info libaokun
2024-05-22 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] cachefiles: never get a new anonymous fd if ondemand_id is valid libaokun
2024-05-22 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] cachefiles: defer exposing anon_fd until after copy_to_user() succeeds libaokun
2024-05-22 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] cachefiles: Set object to close if ondemand_id < 0 in copen libaokun
2024-05-22 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] cachefiles: flush all requests after setting CACHEFILES_DEAD libaokun
2024-05-22 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] cachefiles: make on-demand read killable libaokun
2024-05-29 11:07 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] cachefiles: some bugfixes and cleanups for ondemand requests Christian Brauner
2024-05-29 11:23 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-29 14:28 ` Gao Xiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=943db365-f5e7-4fdc-9f00-d2cd00f527d7@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wozizhi@huawei.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=zhujia.zj@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®