mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>,
	James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] nvmet-fcloop: access fcpreq only when holding reqlock
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:15:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9444ac93-b0f7-4198-ad0f-d8c950b5d0ec@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423-nvmet-fcloop-v5-7-3d7f968728a5@kernel.org>

On 4/23/25 15:21, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The abort handling logic expects that the state and the fcpreq are only
> accessed when holding the reqlock lock.
> 
> While at it, only handle the aborts in the abort handler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
> index 0c0117e03adc81c643e90a7e7832ff087a4c2fd7..9adaee3c7129f7e270842c5d09f78de2e108479a 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
> @@ -619,12 +619,13 @@ fcloop_fcp_recv_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   {
>   	struct fcloop_fcpreq *tfcp_req =
>   		container_of(work, struct fcloop_fcpreq, fcp_rcv_work);
> -	struct nvmefc_fcp_req *fcpreq = tfcp_req->fcpreq;
> +	struct nvmefc_fcp_req *fcpreq;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	int ret = 0;
>   	bool aborted = false;
>   
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&tfcp_req->reqlock, flags);
> +	fcpreq = tfcp_req->fcpreq;
>   	switch (tfcp_req->inistate) {
>   	case INI_IO_START:
>   		tfcp_req->inistate = INI_IO_ACTIVE;
> @@ -639,16 +640,19 @@ fcloop_fcp_recv_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   	}
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tfcp_req->reqlock, flags);
>   
> -	if (unlikely(aborted))
> -		ret = -ECANCELED;
> -	else {
> -		if (likely(!check_for_drop(tfcp_req)))
> -			ret = nvmet_fc_rcv_fcp_req(tfcp_req->tport->targetport,
> -				&tfcp_req->tgt_fcp_req,
> -				fcpreq->cmdaddr, fcpreq->cmdlen);
> -		else
> -			pr_info("%s: dropped command ********\n", __func__);
> +	if (unlikely(aborted)) {
> +		/* the abort handler will call fcloop_call_host_done */
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (unlikely(check_for_drop(tfcp_req))) {
> +		pr_info("%s: dropped command ********\n", __func__);
> +		return;
>   	}
> +
> +	ret = nvmet_fc_rcv_fcp_req(tfcp_req->tport->targetport,
> +				   &tfcp_req->tgt_fcp_req,
> +				   fcpreq->cmdaddr, fcpreq->cmdlen);
>   	if (ret)
>   		fcloop_call_host_done(fcpreq, tfcp_req, ret);
>   }
> @@ -663,9 +667,10 @@ fcloop_fcp_abort_recv_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&tfcp_req->reqlock, flags);
> -	fcpreq = tfcp_req->fcpreq;
>   	switch (tfcp_req->inistate) {
>   	case INI_IO_ABORTED:
> +		fcpreq = tfcp_req->fcpreq;
> +		tfcp_req->fcpreq = NULL;
>   		break;
>   	case INI_IO_COMPLETED:
>   		completed = true;
> @@ -688,10 +693,6 @@ fcloop_fcp_abort_recv_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   		nvmet_fc_rcv_fcp_abort(tfcp_req->tport->targetport,
>   					&tfcp_req->tgt_fcp_req);
>   
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&tfcp_req->reqlock, flags);
> -	tfcp_req->fcpreq = NULL;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tfcp_req->reqlock, flags);
> -
What happens for INI_IO_COMPLETED?
Don't we need to clear the 'fcpreq' pointer in that case, too?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-24 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-23 13:21 [PATCH v5 00/14] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] nvmet-fcloop: track ref counts for nports Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:08   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:13     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] nvmet-fcloop: remove nport from list on last user Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_nport_alloc and track lport Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:09   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_delete_local_port Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:10   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:16     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] nvmet-fcloop: update refs on tfcp_req Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] nvmet-fcloop: add missing fcloop_callback_host_done Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:13   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:26     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] nvmet-fcloop: access fcpreq only when holding reqlock Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:15   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-04-24 11:31     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] nvmet-fcloop: prevent double port deletion Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:32     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] nvmet-fcloop: allocate/free fcloop_lsreq directly Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-07 10:48   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] nvmet-fcloop: don't wait for lport cleanup Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 11:48     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 12:10       ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-24 12:58         ` Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] nvmet-fcloop: drop response if targetport is gone Daniel Wagner
2025-04-24 10:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] nvmet-fc: free pending reqs on tgtport unregister Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] nvmet-fc: take tgtport refs for portentry Daniel Wagner
2025-04-23 13:21 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] nvme-fc: do not reference lsrsp after failure Daniel Wagner
2025-05-06 16:36 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9444ac93-b0f7-4198-ad0f-d8c950b5d0ec@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=wagi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®