From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65AE833F580; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 09:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772703967; cv=none; b=E66AlREegl6V3xqonQgUWQ+qVUmt3nCJqQOGLF9lfkZhn4WkLYBE6HVYmMS5F3fUJz9WnRA+36lMCHp+WS2QKhMdae5KI7DxjzyM8prL50COK9c2TSlPXlYuRDrIaH4c1fC4TGtYI31mUIA0nfekal81E55hOwpg8RIKtBrgIDU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772703967; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qI0vQGpQ9J5PU/VHkTMEyG+Jjq7ShhP2iWcDSkeEoOQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=W6R7eNksnR5h++0cvhVPdrk24TT9BWZ2z8OKP8p+JUFdV5diwXy2ghbwhLBntSN8CcYPmSSxp/civSiEQjN5NOCqlG52bbS1Ana3QpXlxqPt6igunxeKW6Db4L+H84+0591jciRvoAkZj1I7FndrywOBPyw1kBrB+ZV+wqJjXSQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=MpcnuxTw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="MpcnuxTw" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1772703964; bh=qI0vQGpQ9J5PU/VHkTMEyG+Jjq7ShhP2iWcDSkeEoOQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=MpcnuxTw8ZkFdrdd3UtOodNtxRSjJymvguf0Jy7iSET2l3sZUfuO4DBCjBk1MmiPA b/ylMB4Pnfa3kAauLGYhBu4hcHr6ssVNaCSr36tfnvVkOiFEsSTMFSnXgkWpf6LWpf njyJPuIWaky7wPzghqKdthSAXnr0m9Rgj+qIf6PWI1fz8nYwWCUCORZUdJA+C7LK6A GRkuL0HWBsvIu3kG0xszr+FjcG64YWzp2U4tNeHVzUOHekL6wHMpOiv7y5OjLRvhcW evXc+1m+B4x7GWbQL4oGtCgZFcFp09e/vXxmBwIDOrJdUpOnWktXDoA0fxlOi+Yaxu 71IXy2/37cV3Q== Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE70517E0454; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:46:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <94465ca7-b3dc-4736-9d58-4024f2494e54@collabora.com> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:46:03 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: dts: mediatek: mt6589: add basic support for Lenovo B8000-F To: Akari Tsuyukusa , robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, sean.wang@mediatek.com Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20260304192417.818211-1-akkun11.open@gmail.com> <20260304192417.818211-3-akkun11.open@gmail.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20260304192417.818211-3-akkun11.open@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Il 04/03/26 20:24, Akari Tsuyukusa ha scritto: > Lenovo YOGA Tablet 10 (Wi-Fi) - B8000-F is a tablet which belongs > to the "blade" product family. It is powered by MT8125 SoC, > which is the tablet version of MediaTek MT6589, and has 1GB RAM. > > Like other devices in the "blade" family, it uses a framebuffer > initialized by the bootloader at a consistent memory address and size. > This patch adds basic support including UART and simple-framebuffer. Okay, but this is just a simple framebuffer and a UART; while it may be in some way useful, there's already one device based on MT6589 that was upstreamed with just a framebuffer and a serial port, but then didn't receive any more support. Could you please extend your efforts a little and push at least some support for clock controllers and power domains for the MT6589 SoC to make it at least barely useful? P.S.: My intention is not to block you; I very much welcome efforts to upstream smartphones and tablets, but that has to be real upstreaming ;-) Cheers, Angelo