mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	david@redhat.com, vbabka@suse.cz, peterx@redhat.com,
	jannh@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
	paulmck@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, adobriyan@gmail.com,
	brauner@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, yebin10@huawei.com,
	linux@weissschuh.net, willy@infradead.org, osalvador@suse.de,
	andrii@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, tjmercier@google.com,
	kaleshsingh@google.com, aha310510@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] fs/proc/task_mmu: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:50:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <949e71aa-0393-4e6e-b102-33a9eff1e5a4@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250808152850.2580887-4-surenb@google.com>

On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 08:28:49AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Utilize per-vma locks to stabilize vma after lookup without taking
> mmap_lock during PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl execution. If vma lock is
> contended, we fall back to mmap_lock but take it only momentarily
> to lock the vma and release the mmap_lock. In a very unlikely case
> of vm_refcnt overflow, this fall back path will fail and ioctl is
> done under mmap_lock protection.
>
> This change is designed to reduce mmap_lock contention and prevent
> PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl calls from blocking address space updates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

All LGTM, so:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>

> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index c0968d293b61..e64cf40ce9c4 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,12 @@ static void release_task_mempolicy(struct proc_maps_private *priv)
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
>
> +static void reset_lock_ctx(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
> +{
> +	lock_ctx->locked_vma = NULL;
> +	lock_ctx->mmap_locked = false;
> +}

Thanks!

> +
>  static void unlock_ctx_vma(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
>  {
>  	if (lock_ctx->locked_vma) {
> @@ -157,8 +163,7 @@ static inline bool lock_vma_range(struct seq_file *m,
>  		lock_ctx->mmap_locked = true;
>  	} else {
>  		rcu_read_lock();
> -		lock_ctx->locked_vma = NULL;
> -		lock_ctx->mmap_locked = false;
> +		reset_lock_ctx(lock_ctx);
>  	}
>
>  	return true;
> @@ -522,28 +527,90 @@ static int pid_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  		PROCMAP_QUERY_VMA_FLAGS				\
>  )
>
> -static int query_vma_setup(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
> +
> +static int query_vma_setup(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
>  {
> -	return mmap_read_lock_killable(mm);
> +	reset_lock_ctx(lock_ctx);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>
> -static void query_vma_teardown(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +static void query_vma_teardown(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
>  {
> -	mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +	if (lock_ctx->mmap_locked) {
> +		mmap_read_unlock(lock_ctx->mm);
> +		lock_ctx->mmap_locked = false;
> +	} else {
> +		unlock_ctx_vma(lock_ctx);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static struct vm_area_struct *query_vma_find_by_addr(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx,
> +						     unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = lock_ctx->mm;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	struct vma_iterator vmi;
> +
> +	if (lock_ctx->mmap_locked)
> +		return find_vma(mm, addr);
> +
> +	/* Unlock previously locked VMA and find the next one under RCU */
> +	unlock_ctx_vma(lock_ctx);
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	vma_iter_init(&vmi, mm, addr);
> +	vma = lock_next_vma(mm, &vmi, addr);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	if (!vma)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ERR(vma)) {
> +		lock_ctx->locked_vma = vma;
> +		return vma;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (PTR_ERR(vma) == -EAGAIN) {
> +		/* Fallback to mmap_lock on vma->vm_refcnt overflow */
> +		mmap_read_lock(mm);
> +		vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> +		lock_ctx->mmap_locked = true;
> +	}

Thanks this is great!

> +
> +	return vma;
>  }
>
> -static struct vm_area_struct *query_vma_find_by_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> +#else /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
> +
> +static int query_vma_setup(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
> +{
> +	return mmap_read_lock_killable(lock_ctx->mm);
> +}
> +
> +static void query_vma_teardown(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
> +{
> +	mmap_read_unlock(lock_ctx->mm);
> +}
> +
> +static struct vm_area_struct *query_vma_find_by_addr(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx,
> +						     unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	return find_vma(mm, addr);
> +	return find_vma(lock_ctx->mm, addr);
>  }
>
> -static struct vm_area_struct *query_matching_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
> +#endif  /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
> +
> +static struct vm_area_struct *query_matching_vma(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx,
>  						 unsigned long addr, u32 flags)
>  {
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>
>  next_vma:
> -	vma = query_vma_find_by_addr(mm, addr);
> +	vma = query_vma_find_by_addr(lock_ctx, addr);
> +	if (IS_ERR(vma))
> +		return vma;
> +
>  	if (!vma)
>  		goto no_vma;
>
> @@ -584,11 +651,11 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *query_matching_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  	return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>  }
>
> -static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
> +static int do_procmap_query(struct mm_struct *mm, void __user *uarg)
>  {
> +	struct proc_maps_locking_ctx lock_ctx = { .mm = mm };
>  	struct procmap_query karg;
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> -	struct mm_struct *mm;
>  	const char *name = NULL;
>  	char build_id_buf[BUILD_ID_SIZE_MAX], *name_buf = NULL;
>  	__u64 usize;
> @@ -615,17 +682,16 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
>  	if (!!karg.build_id_size != !!karg.build_id_addr)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>
> -	mm = priv->lock_ctx.mm;
>  	if (!mm || !mmget_not_zero(mm))
>  		return -ESRCH;
>
> -	err = query_vma_setup(mm);
> +	err = query_vma_setup(&lock_ctx);
>  	if (err) {
>  		mmput(mm);
>  		return err;
>  	}
>
> -	vma = query_matching_vma(mm, karg.query_addr, karg.query_flags);
> +	vma = query_matching_vma(&lock_ctx, karg.query_addr, karg.query_flags);
>  	if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
>  		err = PTR_ERR(vma);
>  		vma = NULL;
> @@ -710,7 +776,7 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
>  	}
>
>  	/* unlock vma or mmap_lock, and put mm_struct before copying data to user */
> -	query_vma_teardown(mm, vma);
> +	query_vma_teardown(&lock_ctx);
>  	mmput(mm);
>
>  	if (karg.vma_name_size && copy_to_user(u64_to_user_ptr(karg.vma_name_addr),
> @@ -730,7 +796,7 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
>  	return 0;
>
>  out:
> -	query_vma_teardown(mm, vma);
> +	query_vma_teardown(&lock_ctx);
>  	mmput(mm);
>  	kfree(name_buf);
>  	return err;
> @@ -743,7 +809,8 @@ static long procfs_procmap_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned l
>
>  	switch (cmd) {
>  	case PROCMAP_QUERY:
> -		return do_procmap_query(priv, (void __user *)arg);
> +		/* priv->lock_ctx.mm is set during file open operation */

Thanks!

> +		return do_procmap_query(priv->lock_ctx.mm, (void __user *)arg);
>  	default:
>  		return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>  	}
> --
> 2.50.1.703.g449372360f-goog
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-13 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-08 15:28 [PATCH v4 0/3] execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] selftests/proc: test PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl while vma is concurrently modified Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-13 13:38   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-13 16:21     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-13 18:53       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] fs/proc/task_mmu: factor out proc_maps_private fields used by PROCMAP_QUERY Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-13 13:44   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] fs/proc/task_mmu: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-08 17:46   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-11 23:14   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-13 13:50   ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20250914114308.3024033-1-clm@meta.com>
2025-09-15  0:43     ` Suren Baghdasaryan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=949e71aa-0393-4e6e-b102-33a9eff1e5a4@lucifer.local \
    --to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=aha310510@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tjmercier@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®