From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
david@redhat.com, vbabka@suse.cz, peterx@redhat.com,
jannh@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, adobriyan@gmail.com,
brauner@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, yebin10@huawei.com,
linux@weissschuh.net, willy@infradead.org, osalvador@suse.de,
andrii@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, tjmercier@google.com,
kaleshsingh@google.com, aha310510@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] fs/proc/task_mmu: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:50:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <949e71aa-0393-4e6e-b102-33a9eff1e5a4@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250808152850.2580887-4-surenb@google.com>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 08:28:49AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Utilize per-vma locks to stabilize vma after lookup without taking
> mmap_lock during PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl execution. If vma lock is
> contended, we fall back to mmap_lock but take it only momentarily
> to lock the vma and release the mmap_lock. In a very unlikely case
> of vm_refcnt overflow, this fall back path will fail and ioctl is
> done under mmap_lock protection.
>
> This change is designed to reduce mmap_lock contention and prevent
> PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl calls from blocking address space updates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
All LGTM, so:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index c0968d293b61..e64cf40ce9c4 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,12 @@ static void release_task_mempolicy(struct proc_maps_private *priv)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
>
> +static void reset_lock_ctx(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
> +{
> + lock_ctx->locked_vma = NULL;
> + lock_ctx->mmap_locked = false;
> +}
Thanks!
> +
> static void unlock_ctx_vma(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
> {
> if (lock_ctx->locked_vma) {
> @@ -157,8 +163,7 @@ static inline bool lock_vma_range(struct seq_file *m,
> lock_ctx->mmap_locked = true;
> } else {
> rcu_read_lock();
> - lock_ctx->locked_vma = NULL;
> - lock_ctx->mmap_locked = false;
> + reset_lock_ctx(lock_ctx);
> }
>
> return true;
> @@ -522,28 +527,90 @@ static int pid_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> PROCMAP_QUERY_VMA_FLAGS \
> )
>
> -static int query_vma_setup(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
> +
> +static int query_vma_setup(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
> {
> - return mmap_read_lock_killable(mm);
> + reset_lock_ctx(lock_ctx);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> -static void query_vma_teardown(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +static void query_vma_teardown(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
> {
> - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + if (lock_ctx->mmap_locked) {
> + mmap_read_unlock(lock_ctx->mm);
> + lock_ctx->mmap_locked = false;
> + } else {
> + unlock_ctx_vma(lock_ctx);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct vm_area_struct *query_vma_find_by_addr(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx,
> + unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = lock_ctx->mm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct vma_iterator vmi;
> +
> + if (lock_ctx->mmap_locked)
> + return find_vma(mm, addr);
> +
> + /* Unlock previously locked VMA and find the next one under RCU */
> + unlock_ctx_vma(lock_ctx);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + vma_iter_init(&vmi, mm, addr);
> + vma = lock_next_vma(mm, &vmi, addr);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + if (!vma)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(vma)) {
> + lock_ctx->locked_vma = vma;
> + return vma;
> + }
> +
> + if (PTR_ERR(vma) == -EAGAIN) {
> + /* Fallback to mmap_lock on vma->vm_refcnt overflow */
> + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> + vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> + lock_ctx->mmap_locked = true;
> + }
Thanks this is great!
> +
> + return vma;
> }
>
> -static struct vm_area_struct *query_vma_find_by_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> +#else /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
> +
> +static int query_vma_setup(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
> +{
> + return mmap_read_lock_killable(lock_ctx->mm);
> +}
> +
> +static void query_vma_teardown(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx)
> +{
> + mmap_read_unlock(lock_ctx->mm);
> +}
> +
> +static struct vm_area_struct *query_vma_find_by_addr(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx,
> + unsigned long addr)
> {
> - return find_vma(mm, addr);
> + return find_vma(lock_ctx->mm, addr);
> }
>
> -static struct vm_area_struct *query_matching_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
> +
> +static struct vm_area_struct *query_matching_vma(struct proc_maps_locking_ctx *lock_ctx,
> unsigned long addr, u32 flags)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>
> next_vma:
> - vma = query_vma_find_by_addr(mm, addr);
> + vma = query_vma_find_by_addr(lock_ctx, addr);
> + if (IS_ERR(vma))
> + return vma;
> +
> if (!vma)
> goto no_vma;
>
> @@ -584,11 +651,11 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *query_matching_vma(struct mm_struct *mm,
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> }
>
> -static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
> +static int do_procmap_query(struct mm_struct *mm, void __user *uarg)
> {
> + struct proc_maps_locking_ctx lock_ctx = { .mm = mm };
> struct procmap_query karg;
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> - struct mm_struct *mm;
> const char *name = NULL;
> char build_id_buf[BUILD_ID_SIZE_MAX], *name_buf = NULL;
> __u64 usize;
> @@ -615,17 +682,16 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
> if (!!karg.build_id_size != !!karg.build_id_addr)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mm = priv->lock_ctx.mm;
> if (!mm || !mmget_not_zero(mm))
> return -ESRCH;
>
> - err = query_vma_setup(mm);
> + err = query_vma_setup(&lock_ctx);
> if (err) {
> mmput(mm);
> return err;
> }
>
> - vma = query_matching_vma(mm, karg.query_addr, karg.query_flags);
> + vma = query_matching_vma(&lock_ctx, karg.query_addr, karg.query_flags);
> if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(vma);
> vma = NULL;
> @@ -710,7 +776,7 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
> }
>
> /* unlock vma or mmap_lock, and put mm_struct before copying data to user */
> - query_vma_teardown(mm, vma);
> + query_vma_teardown(&lock_ctx);
> mmput(mm);
>
> if (karg.vma_name_size && copy_to_user(u64_to_user_ptr(karg.vma_name_addr),
> @@ -730,7 +796,7 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
> return 0;
>
> out:
> - query_vma_teardown(mm, vma);
> + query_vma_teardown(&lock_ctx);
> mmput(mm);
> kfree(name_buf);
> return err;
> @@ -743,7 +809,8 @@ static long procfs_procmap_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned l
>
> switch (cmd) {
> case PROCMAP_QUERY:
> - return do_procmap_query(priv, (void __user *)arg);
> + /* priv->lock_ctx.mm is set during file open operation */
Thanks!
> + return do_procmap_query(priv->lock_ctx.mm, (void __user *)arg);
> default:
> return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> }
> --
> 2.50.1.703.g449372360f-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-08 15:28 [PATCH v4 0/3] execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] selftests/proc: test PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl while vma is concurrently modified Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-13 13:38 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-13 16:21 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-13 18:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] fs/proc/task_mmu: factor out proc_maps_private fields used by PROCMAP_QUERY Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-13 13:44 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] fs/proc/task_mmu: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-08 17:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-11 23:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-13 13:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
[not found] ` <20250914114308.3024033-1-clm@meta.com>
2025-09-15 0:43 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=949e71aa-0393-4e6e-b102-33a9eff1e5a4@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=aha310510@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®