From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF32E4570D8; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789387448; cv=none; b=E5uxjt4EixY9kRPlmYq9WzcgV9duJQJIyNtXwpfQ0NOikNDpe7dRT6yygY43MbmeZe0XYjPtYSnIxvToDTsxXnFUlinaVZYrrNYluyovCgk3pP3pBPcXmeto2eHsC+EvuJJPiXM/SQ6gI9fEO+SxHTD2uLh8vehSF43zyLLg76Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789387448; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gKOpORfZZq9WL4GdKkT6J4ZawStjF0sjbadPfw+E4YI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=KF5zXOeyI9xtsXN+J9FX3ujA19+x7EETxU1mqsUHJq1rQHYPBDz0w2Yyt75TkJqAdSz/0yMSqr4tMbjnBIvGDgCaes8H9PnfhJIHB4d20TWrYaeLXre8KEg5juElAl1cDA7/6+cRIoSn3P89s8pn+6vDVnyswAMgVOCxBU4nax4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=WOdQfsOx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="WOdQfsOx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1789387444; bh=gKOpORfZZq9WL4GdKkT6J4ZawStjF0sjbadPfw+E4YI=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=WOdQfsOx/T0ceqL5oapOcdLeeiktULtm7ihs6SFh+NUe7Y/achPrLONtXSgaWdanO NDfWJMUiA4gk4wNunkSvPqnZX8it41xUrl+r6OapZwOdrUlxsf3hCq6ELaE4wXM6yc GzLDOkovTKeEjTAOp8CRXH1V7iGhF9WhrobFk0y4yecR9nQN2Q/toQk29E6ekCGDI3 beYlUSMdKVoyraor1bhH7ZTkAhqj8oqQFRuvadhAX6aObEDXXR0tzA0F2Z2C1ld9BH 7cUZtBoC7SRM4TuWcOVAyXJ+H6ib+Apq1uLVrbTon46L3wGmLPqONmylhoCWPojD3B R3oIFKLp1hzaQ== Received: from [100.64.1.21] (unknown [100.64.1.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04BFC17E091A; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:04:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <94a11a7a-0f9e-40b5-aa1b-7d5be34c99ac@collabora.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:04:02 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 03/24] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Add mt8196 variant To: Louis-Alexis Eyraud , Chunfeng Yun , Vinod Koul , Neil Armstrong , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , Peter Wang , Chaotian Jing , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , Bart Van Assche , Stanley Jhu , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Philipp Zabel , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Manivannan Sadhasivam , "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Frattaroli References: <20260914-mt8196-ufs-v12-0-9279d7ef814d@collabora.com> <20260914-mt8196-ufs-v12-3-9279d7ef814d@collabora.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20260914-mt8196-ufs-v12-3-9279d7ef814d@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/14/26 13:38, Louis-Alexis Eyraud wrote: > From: Nicolas Frattaroli > > The MediaTek MT8196 SoC's UFS controller uses a different set of supplies. > It is therefore not compatible with the MT8195. It also have an additional > 0.9V supply pin (AVDD09_UFS_1), that is specific to this SoC, thus not > currently described in the binding. > > Add a compatible for this SoC and new property for the additional supply, > and modify the binding correspondingly. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli > Reviewed-by: Chaotian Jing > Signed-off-by: Louis-Alexis Eyraud Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno