From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Fix the decoding of segment overrides in 64bit mode
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:53:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94bbfac5-2022-ab92-0b9a-1c3cd2275054@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+CwmJQCFZ7oe1_YatqoOXzzEU+SP9Z5qR6zU_ybd_DoGQQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 22/03/18 13:39, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2018-03-22 20:38 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>:
>> On 22/03/2018 12:04, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> We've got a Force Emulation Prefix (ud2a; .ascii "xen") for doing
>>> magic. Originally, this was used for PV guests to explicitly request an
>>> emulated CPUID, but I extended it to HVM guests for "emulate the next
>>> instruction", after we had some guest user => guest kernel privilege
>>> escalations because of incorrect emulation.
>> Wanpeng, why don't you add it behind a new kvm module parameter? :)
> Great point! I will have a try. Thanks Paolo and Andrew. :)
Using the force emulation prefix requires intercepting #UD, which is in
general a BadThing(tm) for security. Therefore, we have a build time
configuration option to compile in support, and require that test
systems explicitly opt into using it via a command line parameter.
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c;h=db52312882205e65b32e587106ca795f4bfab2eb;hb=refs/heads/staging#l3741
is the general #UD intercept handler if you want a reference. (You can
ignore the cross-vendor part, which is leftovers from
http://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/2012/10/CrossVendorMigration.pdf )
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-22 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-22 8:34 Wanpeng Li
2018-03-22 10:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-22 10:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-03-22 10:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-22 11:04 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-03-22 11:14 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-03-22 12:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-22 13:39 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-03-22 13:53 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2018-03-23 14:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-03-23 14:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-03-23 15:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-26 12:25 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-03-26 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94bbfac5-2022-ab92-0b9a-1c3cd2275054@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®