From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>,
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, Yue Hu <zbestahu@gmail.com>,
Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] erofs: lazily initialize per-CPU workers and CPU hotplug hooks
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 08:31:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94c702b9-cad5-4727-a7f1-16de1827841e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423061023.131354-1-dhavale@google.com>
On 2025/4/23 14:10, Sandeep Dhavale wrote:
> Currently, when EROFS is built with per-CPU workers, the workers are
> started and CPU hotplug hooks are registered during module initialization.
> This leads to unnecessary worker start/stop cycles during CPU hotplug
> events, particularly on Android devices that frequently suspend and resume.
>
> This change defers the initialization of per-CPU workers and the
> registration of CPU hotplug hooks until the first EROFS mount. This
> ensures that these resources are only allocated and managed when EROFS is
> actually in use.
>
> The tear down of per-CPU workers and unregistration of CPU hotplug hooks
> still occurs during z_erofs_exit_subsystem(), but only if they were
> initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
...
> int z_erofs_init_super(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> - struct inode *const inode = new_inode(sb);
> + struct inode *inode;
> + int err;
>
> + err = z_erofs_init_pcpu_workers();
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + inode = new_inode(sb);
> if (!inode)
> return -ENOMEM;
> +
I think the new blank line is redundant, the setup part
should be next to new_inode().
I could fix up this part manually if you don't have strong
opinion on this.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 6:10 Sandeep Dhavale
2025-04-24 0:31 ` Gao Xiang [this message]
2025-04-24 6:04 ` Sandeep Dhavale
2025-04-24 12:02 ` Gao Xiang
2025-04-25 2:15 ` Chao Yu
2025-04-28 21:49 ` Sandeep Dhavale
2025-04-29 6:05 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94c702b9-cad5-4727-a7f1-16de1827841e@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dhavale@google.com \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
--cc=zbestahu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®