From: Ken Goldman <kgold@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tpm_tis TPM2.0 not detected on cold boot
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 12:56:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94e4968b-0b19-f0ca-24d8-e8105c1af704@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546140837.4069.81.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 12/29/2018 10:33 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> But the problem you've described is on a cold boot, not a soft reboot.
> Both the soft reboot and kexec are working properly. It seems the
> difference is that on a cold boot, the TPM takes longer to initialize.
I would expect this.
The TPM doesn't even see a 'soft reboot' right?
OTOH, a 'cold boot' hits the TPM Init pin, which causes the take several
actions. Probably the one with the most impact is resetting the state
of self test. Thus, the TPM will require a function to be self tested
before it can be used, adding delays.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-31 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-16 13:32 Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-22 13:47 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-22 22:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-12-23 11:55 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-25 13:55 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-30 3:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-12-30 13:22 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-31 18:10 ` Ken Goldman
2018-12-31 21:17 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-01-01 16:15 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-01 16:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-01-01 16:47 ` Michael Niewöhner
2018-12-31 17:56 ` Ken Goldman [this message]
2019-01-03 13:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-03 13:38 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-03 15:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-03 15:47 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-04 11:58 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-04 15:28 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-04 18:26 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-10 17:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-10 18:03 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-10 17:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-10 18:00 ` Michael Niewöhner
2019-01-03 13:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-01-03 13:55 ` Michael Niewöhner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94e4968b-0b19-f0ca-24d8-e8105c1af704@linux.ibm.com \
--to=kgold@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®