From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: hyenc.jeong@samsung.com,
"James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jinyoung Choi <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
Dukhyun Kwon <d_hyun.kwon@samsung.com>,
Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@samsung.com>,
Keoseong Park <keosung.park@samsung.com>,
Jaemyung Lee <jaemyung.lee@samsung.com>,
Jieon Seol <jieon.seol@samsung.com>,
Gyusun Lee <gyusun.lee@samsung.com>,
Yunjae Jo <yunjae00.jo@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: Add support for the aggregated read query opcode
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:27:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94ebf206-5d9b-4ab3-a9ec-af80de45f3c2@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723074724epcms2p16cc926dd07e3f932db8efb71d1e1268c@epcms2p1>
On 7/23/26 12:47 AM, Hyeoncheol Jeong wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the detailed review. I've addressed the comments and
> will send a v3. Replies inline below.
Please post v3 as a new email thread instead of a reply to this thread.
Replies are overlooked more easily than a new thread.
> On 7/23/26 2:09 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> +static inline size_t ufshcd_get_devman_ucd_size(const struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>> +{
>>> + return sizeof(struct utp_devman_cmd_desc) + SG_ALL * ufshcd_sg_entry_size(hba);
>>> +}
>>
>> Why SG_ALL? The data buffer for device management commands is allocated
>> with kmalloc() and hence is contiguous so a single segment descriptor
>> should be sufficient.
>
> This is the one comment I haven't applied yet, and I'd like to
> double-check with you before doing so.
>
> The aggregated read path indeed does not use the PRDT at all. But
> the reserved tag is also used by advanced RPMB. I understood that path
> builds a PRDT via ufshcd_sgl_to_prdt() from the BSG payload, whose sg_cnt
> can exceed one when the user buffer spans multiple segments. Keeping
> SG_ALL preserves the existing RPMB behaviour; I thought shrinking to a
> single segment could truncate multi-segment transfers.
>
> Did I miss something about how RPMB maps its payload here?
BSG uses struct sg_io_v4 and that data structure supports I/O vectors.
How about changing SG_ALL into 2, which should be sufficient for 4096
bytes spread over two discontiguous physical pages? I think it's fine
not to support the I/O vectors that can be generated by user space code
like this program:
https://github.com/linux-blktests/blktests/blob/master/src/discontiguous-io.cpp
Thanks,
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20260710053524epcms2p82121eba4240c37112fc5669430035442@epcms2p6>
2026-07-10 5:45 ` [PATCH] " Hyeoncheol Jeong
2026-07-10 14:46 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <CGME20260710053524epcms2p82121eba4240c37112fc5669430035442@epcms2p4>
2026-07-13 2:52 ` Hyeoncheol Jeong
2026-07-13 12:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-07-16 2:51 ` Hyeoncheol Jeong
2026-07-22 8:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Hyeoncheol Jeong
2026-07-22 17:08 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <CGME20260710053524epcms2p82121eba4240c37112fc5669430035442@epcms2p1>
2026-07-23 7:47 ` Hyeoncheol Jeong
2026-07-23 19:27 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94ebf206-5d9b-4ab3-a9ec-af80de45f3c2@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=d_hyun.kwon@samsung.com \
--cc=gyusun.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=hyenc.jeong@samsung.com \
--cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jaemyung.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=jeuk20.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=jieon.seol@samsung.com \
--cc=keosung.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=yunjae00.jo@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®