mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Xen: ARM: Zero reserved fields of xatp before making hypervisor call
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:03:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94f7da28-6d5c-b86b-9e96-353e804c9828@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1701031003050.17742@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>

Hi Stefano,

On 03/01/17 18:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 28/12/16 01:47, Jiandi An wrote:
>>> Ensure all reserved fields of xatp are zero before making
>>> hypervisor call to XEN in xen_map_device_mmio().
>>> xenmem_add_to_physmap_one() in XEN fails the mapping request if
>>> extra.res reserved field in xatp is not zero for XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio
>>> request.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> Changed zeroing xatp to a static initialization
>>> of .domid and .space for xatp.
>>>
>>>  drivers/xen/arm-device.c | 8 +++++---
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/arm-device.c b/drivers/xen/arm-device.c
>>> index 778acf8..85dd20e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/xen/arm-device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/arm-device.c
>>> @@ -58,9 +58,13 @@ static int xen_map_device_mmio(const struct resource *resources,
>>>  	xen_pfn_t *gpfns;
>>>  	xen_ulong_t *idxs;
>>>  	int *errs;
>>> -	struct xen_add_to_physmap_range xatp;
>>>
>>>  	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>>> +		struct xen_add_to_physmap_range xatp = {
>>> +			.domid = DOMID_SELF,
>>> +			.space = XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio
>>> +		};
>>> +
>>
>> I still don't see the need to re-initialize the input parts of xatp
>> on each loop iteration unless you can show the need for it (e.g. a
>> buggy hypervisor version not conforming to the interface specification).
>>
>> OTOH I don't feel really strong about it and let Stefano being the
>> maintainer for the ARM parts decide.
>
> I don't feel strongly about this either - I think this patch is good
> enough. I'll apply to xentip.

I think this patch should be backported to stable trees because the 
issue could appear depending on the compiler.

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall

      reply	other threads:[~2017-01-16 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-28  0:47 Jiandi An
2017-01-02  6:13 ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-03 18:03   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-01-16 15:03     ` Julien Grall [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94f7da28-6d5c-b86b-9e96-353e804c9828@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=anjiandi@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®