From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@linux.intel.com>
Cc: irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com, david.e.box@linux.intel.com,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Improve function to show substate header
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 14:34:10 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <951682a6-66e7-cd1a-4798-c5b4f88c79ec@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625063145.624585-4-xi.pardee@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Xi Pardee wrote:
> Refactor pmc_core_substate_req_header_show() to accept a new argument.
> This is a preparation patch to introduce a new way to show Low Power
> Mode substate requirement data for platforms starting from Panther
> Lake. Increased the size for the name column as the Low Power Mode
> requirement register name is longer in newer platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> index a1dd80bdbd413..47cc5120e7dd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> @@ -828,17 +828,20 @@ static int pmc_core_substate_l_sts_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> }
> DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(pmc_core_substate_l_sts_regs);
>
> -static void pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(struct seq_file *s, int pmc_index)
> +static void pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(struct seq_file *s, int pmc_index, char *name)
> {
> struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private;
> int mode;
>
> - seq_printf(s, "%30s |", "Element");
> + seq_printf(s, "%40s |", "Element");
> pmc_for_each_mode(mode, pmcdev)
> seq_printf(s, " %9s |", pmc_lpm_modes[mode]);
>
> - seq_printf(s, " %9s |", "Status");
> - seq_printf(s, " %11s |\n", "Live Status");
> + if (!strcmp(name, "Status")) {
I'm not very happy passing this as string. Could we use an
internal defines/enum instead for this differentiation?
> + seq_printf(s, " %9s |", name);
> + seq_printf(s, " %11s |\n", "Live Status");
> + } else
> + seq_printf(s, " %9s |\n", name);
Please always use braces symmetrically in both blocks.
> }
>
> static int pmc_core_substate_req_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> @@ -872,7 +875,7 @@ static int pmc_core_substate_req_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> continue;
>
> /* Display the header */
> - pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(s, pmc_index);
> + pmc_core_substate_req_header_show(s, pmc_index, "Status");
>
> /* Loop over maps */
> for (mp = 0; mp < num_maps; mp++) {
> @@ -910,7 +913,7 @@ static int pmc_core_substate_req_regs_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> }
>
> /* Display the element name in the first column */
> - seq_printf(s, "pmc%d: %26s |", pmc_index, map[i].name);
> + seq_printf(s, "pmc%d: %34s |", pmc_index, map[i].name);
>
> /* Loop over the enabled states and display if required */
> pmc_for_each_mode(mode, pmcdev) {
>
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-30 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 6:31 [PATCH v2 0/5] Enable SSRAM support in PTL and LNL Xi Pardee
2025-06-25 6:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Enable SSRAM support for Lunar Lake Xi Pardee
2025-06-30 11:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-25 6:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Move telemetry endpoint register handling Xi Pardee
2025-06-30 11:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-25 6:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Improve function to show substate header Xi Pardee
2025-06-30 11:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2025-06-30 17:35 ` Xi Pardee
2025-06-25 6:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Show substate requirement for S0ix blockers Xi Pardee
2025-06-26 16:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-26 21:16 ` Xi Pardee
2025-06-27 8:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-30 18:01 ` Xi Pardee
2025-06-25 6:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Enable SSRAM support for Panther Lake Xi Pardee
2025-06-30 11:28 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=951682a6-66e7-cd1a-4798-c5b4f88c79ec@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xi.pardee@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®