mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@collabora.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/11] drm/i915/gem: selftest should not attempt mmap of private regions
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 14:31:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9546dda7-48ec-58fe-d464-53338948b0d3@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68231920-8eef-1e10-df40-ac8cd0dd0802@intel.com>



On 08/07/2022 14:27, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 08/07/2022 14:22, Robert Beckett wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/07/2022 08:53, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2022 21:02, Robert Beckett wrote:
>>>> During testing make can_mmap consider whether the region is private.
>>>
>>> Do we still need this with: 938d2fd17d17 ("drm/i915/selftests: skip 
>>> the mman tests for stolen") ?
>>
>> huh, I guess not. That wasn't in my tree. I guess I should rebase.
>>
>> Looking at it, my patch would have been preferable initially I think. 
>> Each location of the additional checks in that patch first call 
>> cam_mmap(), which I think is the most appropriate place to make the 
>> decision.
> 
> It fails at the object_create() I think (on small-BAR I mean), which is 
> before we can call can_mmap(), passing in the object.

ah, okay. That makes sense to keep as is then.
I'll drop this patch.
Thanks.

> 
>>
>> I could do a replacement patch that reverts that one if preferred, or 
>> we can leave it as is and I will drop this patch.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@collabora.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c | 3 +++
>>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c 
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c
>>>> index 5bc93a1ce3e3..76181e28c75e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c
>>>> @@ -869,6 +869,9 @@ static bool can_mmap(struct drm_i915_gem_object 
>>>> *obj, enum i915_mmap_type type)
>>>>       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
>>>>       bool no_map;
>>>> +    if (obj->mm.region && obj->mm.region->private)
>>>> +        return false;
>>>> +
>>>>       if (obj->ops->mmap_offset)
>>>>           return type == I915_MMAP_TYPE_FIXED;
>>>>       else if (type == I915_MMAP_TYPE_FIXED)

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-08 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220707200230.1657555-1-bob.beckett@collabora.com>
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 01/11] drm/i915/ttm: dont trample cache_level overrides during ttm move Robert Beckett
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 02/11] drm/i915: limit ttm to dma32 for i965G[M] Robert Beckett
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 03/11] drm/i915/ttm: only trust snooping for dgfx when deciding default cache_level Robert Beckett
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 04/11] drm/i915/gem: selftest should not attempt mmap of private regions Robert Beckett
2022-07-08  7:53   ` Matthew Auld
2022-07-08 13:22     ` Robert Beckett
2022-07-08 13:27       ` Matthew Auld
2022-07-08 13:31         ` Robert Beckett [this message]
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 05/11] drm/i915: instantiate ttm ranger manager for stolen memory Robert Beckett
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 06/11] drm/i915: sanitize mem_flags for stolen buffers Robert Beckett
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 07/11] drm/i915: ttm move/clear logic fix Robert Beckett
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 08/11] drm/i915/ttm: add buffer pin on alloc flag Robert Beckett
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 09/11] drm/i915/selftest: don't attempt engine reset of guc submission engines Robert Beckett
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 10/11] drm/i915/selftest: wait for requests during engine reset selftest Robert Beckett
2022-07-07 20:02 ` [PATCH v10 11/11] drm/i915: stolen memory use ttm backend Robert Beckett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9546dda7-48ec-58fe-d464-53338948b0d3@collabora.com \
    --to=bob.beckett@collabora.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®