mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm_pmu: Remove unused PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS capability
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:04:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95506174-546c-9bf7-82af-09058550be6d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86792ab2-864a-5c27-95c1-54c4057024db@arm.com>



On 11/07/2023 13:08, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/10/23 17:51, James Clark wrote:
>> Since commit bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling") the
>> relationship between perf_event_context and PMUs has changed so that
>> the error scenario that PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS originally
>> silenced no longer exists.
>>
>> Remove the capability and associated comment to avoid confusion that it
>> actually influences any perf core behavior. This change should be a
>> no-op.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 7 ++-----
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
>> index d8844a9461a2..297906df6628 100644
>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
>> @@ -872,15 +872,12 @@ struct arm_pmu *armpmu_alloc(void)
>>  		.attr_groups	= pmu->attr_groups,
>>  		/*
>>  		 * This is a CPU PMU potentially in a heterogeneous
>> -		 * configuration (e.g. big.LITTLE). This is not an uncore PMU,
>> -		 * and we have taken ctx sharing into account (e.g. with our
>> -		 * pmu::filter callback and pmu::event_init group validation).
>> -		 *
>> +		 * configuration (e.g. big.LITTLE) so
>>  		 * PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE is required to open the legacy
>>  		 * PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE and PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE events on a
>>  		 * specific PMU.
>>  		 */
>> -		.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS | PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS |
>> +		.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS |
>>  				  PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE,
> 
> Small nit, the second line could be folded back into the first one.

.clang-format has a column limit of 80 which is why it gets folded. The
kernel coding style guide also still says 80 is a strongly preferred
limit so I'll probably leave it.

> 
>>  	};
>>  

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-11 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-10 12:21 [PATCH 0/4] arm_pmu: Add PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE capability James Clark
2023-07-10 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] " James Clark
2023-07-10 16:04   ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-11 12:01   ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-11 14:12     ` James Clark
2023-07-20 17:12       ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-21 10:21         ` Will Deacon
2023-07-24 13:46           ` James Clark
2023-07-10 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf/x86: Remove unused PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS capability James Clark
2023-07-10 16:07   ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-10 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm_pmu: " James Clark
2023-07-10 16:08   ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-11 12:08   ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-11 14:04     ` James Clark [this message]
2023-07-10 12:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: " James Clark
2023-07-10 16:09   ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-11 12:10   ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-11 14:15     ` James Clark
2023-07-13  7:30       ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-13  9:15         ` James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95506174-546c-9bf7-82af-09058550be6d@arm.com \
    --to=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®