From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm_pmu: Remove unused PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS capability
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:04:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95506174-546c-9bf7-82af-09058550be6d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86792ab2-864a-5c27-95c1-54c4057024db@arm.com>
On 11/07/2023 13:08, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 7/10/23 17:51, James Clark wrote:
>> Since commit bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling") the
>> relationship between perf_event_context and PMUs has changed so that
>> the error scenario that PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS originally
>> silenced no longer exists.
>>
>> Remove the capability and associated comment to avoid confusion that it
>> actually influences any perf core behavior. This change should be a
>> no-op.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 7 ++-----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
>> index d8844a9461a2..297906df6628 100644
>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
>> @@ -872,15 +872,12 @@ struct arm_pmu *armpmu_alloc(void)
>> .attr_groups = pmu->attr_groups,
>> /*
>> * This is a CPU PMU potentially in a heterogeneous
>> - * configuration (e.g. big.LITTLE). This is not an uncore PMU,
>> - * and we have taken ctx sharing into account (e.g. with our
>> - * pmu::filter callback and pmu::event_init group validation).
>> - *
>> + * configuration (e.g. big.LITTLE) so
>> * PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE is required to open the legacy
>> * PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE and PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE events on a
>> * specific PMU.
>> */
>> - .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS | PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS |
>> + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS |
>> PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE,
>
> Small nit, the second line could be folded back into the first one.
.clang-format has a column limit of 80 which is why it gets folded. The
kernel coding style guide also still says 80 is a strongly preferred
limit so I'll probably leave it.
>
>> };
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 12:21 [PATCH 0/4] arm_pmu: Add PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE capability James Clark
2023-07-10 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] " James Clark
2023-07-10 16:04 ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-11 12:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-11 14:12 ` James Clark
2023-07-20 17:12 ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-21 10:21 ` Will Deacon
2023-07-24 13:46 ` James Clark
2023-07-10 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf/x86: Remove unused PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS capability James Clark
2023-07-10 16:07 ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-10 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm_pmu: " James Clark
2023-07-10 16:08 ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-11 12:08 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-11 14:04 ` James Clark [this message]
2023-07-10 12:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: " James Clark
2023-07-10 16:09 ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-11 12:10 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-11 14:15 ` James Clark
2023-07-13 7:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-13 9:15 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95506174-546c-9bf7-82af-09058550be6d@arm.com \
--to=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®