From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=e/xi=M4=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AADAC04EBD
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:29:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3682205C9
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:29:10 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D3682205C9
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727067AbeJPQS0 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 16 Oct 2018 12:18:26 -0400
Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:52647 "EHLO huawei.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726539AbeJPQS0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 16 Oct 2018 12:18:26 -0400
Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60])
        by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 88F52C54093EE;
        Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:29:05 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.202.226.41) by DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com
 (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Tue, 16 Oct 2018
 16:28:55 +0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] hisi_sas: Misc bugfixes and an optimisation patch
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
References: <1537801594-207139-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
 <yq18t354532.fsf@oracle.com>
 <e771c366-2824-8774-4c90-9906992ee813@huawei.com>
 <yq1h8hmv7kf.fsf@oracle.com>
CC:     <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
        <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From:   John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <956dafea-bca3-f3a0-318e-83399b84605c@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:28:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <yq1h8hmv7kf.fsf@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.202.226.41]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 16/10/2018 05:28, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> John,
>
>> As I mentioned in the thread that spawned from this, we actually can't
>> expose multiple hw queues at the moment. And, if we did, we find a
>> performance drop due to having to go back to manage this IPTT
>> internally.
>>
>> So how to handle? We're going to continue to work towards exposing
>> multiple queues to upper layer, but for the moment I think patch 6/7 is
>> a good change.
>
> Thanks for the discussion. That's exactly what I was looking for.
>
> Applied to 4.20/scsi-queue.
>

Great, thanks.